From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:36:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030419173602.E4082@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304191622.h3JGMI9L000263@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>; from john@grabjohn.com on Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 05:22:18PM +0100
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 05:22:18PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> A RAID-0 array and regular backups are the best way to protect your
> data.
Correction. RAID-0 is the best way to loose your data. If any device
containing any part of the array goes down, you loose at least some of
your data.
RAID-1 is the redundant raid level, where each device in the set
contains a duplicate of the other device(s).
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-19 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-19 16:04 Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-19 17:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 22:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 16:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 13:59 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 16:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:12 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:21 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 18:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 20:00 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 1:51 ` jw schultz
2003-04-19 21:13 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-04-20 16:07 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 16:40 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:20 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 9:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 9:55 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 12:14 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:22 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:36 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-04-19 16:45 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:52 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 20:04 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-21 9:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 9:42 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 10:25 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 10:50 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:38 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 14:21 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 9:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 9:35 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:03 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:04 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:22 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 11:46 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:13 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:05 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 23:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-04-19 17:54 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-04-25 0:07 ` Stewart Smith
2003-04-25 0:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-25 7:13 ` John Bradford
[not found] ` <20030419161011$0136@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-19 17:18 ` Florian Weimer
2003-04-19 18:07 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 18:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-04-19 20:56 ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-19 21:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-20 10:51 ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-20 19:04 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-19 21:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-21 8:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-05 12:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-19 22:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 8:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-25 0:11 ` Stewart Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-20 15:06 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 15:19 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:03 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:25 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:28 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-21 9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:28 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
[not found] <mail.linux.kernel/20030420185512.763df745.skraw@ithnet.com>
[not found] ` <03Apr21.020150edt.41463@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2003-04-21 11:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:52 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 14:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-05-06 7:03 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030419173602.E4082@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.