From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:36:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030421113641.10603ae1.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304201331_MC3-1-3532-FFDA@compuserve.com>
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:28:21 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote:
> Stephan wrote:
>
>
> > Maybe I have something in common with google, I am re-writing large parts
> > (well over 50%) of the harddrives capacity on a daily basis (in the
> > discussed setup). how many people really do that?
>
>
> I'll bet the people who do are using SCSI disks...
Guess what, I would do that too, if it were affordable. I have to say I have
never ever experienced problems like these with SCSI disks. Never.
Currently there is a _big_ difference in prices between IDE and SCSI drives. On
the other hand one could argue that there is a good reason for it...
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-21 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-20 17:28 Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-21 9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
[not found] <mail.linux.kernel/20030420185512.763df745.skraw@ithnet.com>
[not found] ` <03Apr21.020150edt.41463@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2003-04-21 11:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:52 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 14:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-05-06 7:03 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:44 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:28 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:03 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 17:25 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 15:06 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-20 15:19 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:04 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-19 17:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 22:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 16:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 13:59 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 16:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:12 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:21 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 18:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 20:00 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 1:51 ` jw schultz
2003-04-19 21:13 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-04-20 16:07 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 16:40 ` John Bradford
2003-04-20 17:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 17:20 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 9:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 9:55 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 11:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-21 12:14 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:22 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:36 ` Russell King
2003-04-19 16:45 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 16:52 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 20:04 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-21 9:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 9:42 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 10:25 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 10:50 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:38 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-20 14:21 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 9:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 9:35 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:03 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:04 ` John Bradford
2003-04-21 11:22 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-04-21 11:46 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-21 12:13 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 20:05 ` John Bradford
2003-04-19 23:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-04-19 17:54 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-04-25 0:07 ` Stewart Smith
2003-04-25 0:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-25 7:13 ` John Bradford
[not found] ` <20030419161011$0136@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-19 17:18 ` Florian Weimer
2003-04-19 18:07 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 18:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-04-19 20:56 ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-19 21:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-20 10:51 ` Helge Hafting
2003-04-20 19:04 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-19 21:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 10:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-21 8:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-05 12:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-19 22:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 8:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-25 0:11 ` Stewart Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030421113641.10603ae1.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.