All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: bcrl@redhat.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - async bread
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:51:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030424105119.F2288@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030424102221.A2166@in.ibm.com>; from suparna@in.ibm.com on Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:22:22AM +0530

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:22:22AM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> Here is a revised version of the filesystem AIO patches
> for 2.5.68.
> 
> 06bread_wq.patch	: Async bread implementation
> 

Pre-req for the filesystem specific async get block 
patches.

Regards
Suparna

06bread_wq.patch
................

 fs/buffer.c                 |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/buffer_head.h |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -ur -X /home/kiran/dontdiff linux-2.5.68/fs/buffer.c linux-aio-2568/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.5.68/fs/buffer.c	Mon Apr 21 23:30:33 2003
+++ linux-aio-2568/fs/buffer.c	Mon Apr 21 17:26:58 2003
@@ -118,23 +118,35 @@
  * from becoming locked again - you have to lock it yourself
  * if you want to preserve its state.
  */
-void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+int __wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head * bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
 {
 	wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bh_waitq_head(bh);
-	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+	DEFINE_WAIT(local_wait);
+
+	if (!wait)
+		wait = &local_wait;
 
 	if (atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == 0 &&
 			(!bh->b_page || !PageLocked(bh->b_page)))
 		buffer_error();
 
 	do {
-		prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		prepare_to_wait(wqh, wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
 			blk_run_queues();
+			if (!is_sync_wait(wait)) {
+				return -EIOCBRETRY;
+			}
 			io_schedule();
 		}
 	} while (buffer_locked(bh));
-	finish_wait(wqh, &wait);
+	finish_wait(wqh, wait);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+{
+	__wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, NULL);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1190,9 +1202,12 @@
 	__brelse(bh);
 }
 
-static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, 
+		wait_queue_t *wait)
 {
-	lock_buffer(bh);
+	if (-EIOCBRETRY == lock_buffer_wq(bh, wait))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBRETRY);
+
 	if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
 		unlock_buffer(bh);
 		return bh;
@@ -1202,7 +1217,8 @@
 		get_bh(bh);
 		bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_io_sync;
 		submit_bh(READ, bh);
-		wait_on_buffer(bh);
+		if (-EIOCBRETRY == wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait))
+			return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBRETRY);
 		if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
 			return bh;
 	}
@@ -1210,6 +1226,11 @@
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+	return __bread_slow_wq(bh, NULL);
+}
+	
 /*
  * Per-cpu buffer LRU implementation.  To reduce the cost of __find_get_block().
  * The bhs[] array is sorted - newest buffer is at bhs[0].  Buffers have their
@@ -1384,6 +1405,18 @@
 		bh = __bread_slow(bh);
 	return bh;
 }
+
+
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_wq(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size,
+	wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size);
+
+	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
+		bh = __bread_slow_wq(bh, wait);
+	return bh;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
 
 /*
@@ -1822,8 +1855,11 @@
 			clear_buffer_new(bh);
 		if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
 			err = get_block(inode, block, bh, 1);
-			if (err)
+			if (err) {
+				if (-EIOCBRETRY == err)
+					pr_debug("get_block queued\n");
 				goto out;
+			}
 			if (buffer_new(bh)) {
 				clear_buffer_new(bh);
 				unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev,
@@ -1865,6 +1901,8 @@
 	 * If we issued read requests - let them complete.
 	 */
 	while(wait_bh > wait) {
+		if (!is_sync_wait(current->io_wait))
+			printk("block_prepare_write: wait on buffer\n");
 		wait_on_buffer(*--wait_bh);
 		if (!buffer_uptodate(*wait_bh))
 			return -EIO;
diff -ur -X /home/kiran/dontdiff linux-2.5.68/include/linux/buffer_head.h linux-aio-2568/include/linux/buffer_head.h
--- linux-2.5.68/include/linux/buffer_head.h	Fri Apr 11 21:10:51 2003
+++ linux-aio-2568/include/linux/buffer_head.h	Wed Apr 16 16:31:12 2003
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@
 void __invalidate_buffers(kdev_t dev, int);
 int sync_blockdev(struct block_device *bdev);
 void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *);
+int __wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *, wait_queue_t *wait);
 wait_queue_head_t *bh_waitq_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
 void wake_up_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh);
 int fsync_bdev(struct block_device *);
@@ -172,6 +173,8 @@
 void __brelse(struct buffer_head *);
 void __bforget(struct buffer_head *);
 struct buffer_head *__bread(struct block_device *, sector_t block, int size);
+struct buffer_head *__bread_wq(struct block_device *, sector_t block, 
+	int size, wait_queue_t *wait);
 struct buffer_head *alloc_buffer_head(void);
 void free_buffer_head(struct buffer_head * bh);
 void FASTCALL(unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh));
@@ -229,13 +232,13 @@
 
 static inline void brelse(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	if (bh)
+	if (bh && !IS_ERR(bh))
 		__brelse(bh);
 }
 
 static inline void bforget(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	if (bh)
+	if (bh && !IS_ERR(bh))
 		__bforget(bh);
 }
 
@@ -246,7 +249,12 @@
 }
 
 static inline struct buffer_head *
-sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
+sb_bread_wq(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	return __bread_wq(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize, wait);
+}
+
+static inline struct buffer_head *sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
 {
 	return __getblk(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
 }
@@ -276,10 +284,26 @@
 		__wait_on_buffer(bh);
 }
 
+static inline int wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	if (buffer_locked(bh))
+		return __wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
 	while (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
 		__wait_on_buffer(bh);
 }
 
+static inline int lock_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	if (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
+		return __wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BUFFER_HEAD_H */

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Labs, India


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: bcrl@redhat.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - async bread
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:51:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030424105119.F2288@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030424102221.A2166@in.ibm.com>; from suparna@in.ibm.com on Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:22:22AM +0530

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:22:22AM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> Here is a revised version of the filesystem AIO patches
> for 2.5.68.
> 
> 06bread_wq.patch	: Async bread implementation
> 

Pre-req for the filesystem specific async get block 
patches.

Regards
Suparna

06bread_wq.patch
................

 fs/buffer.c                 |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/buffer_head.h |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -ur -X /home/kiran/dontdiff linux-2.5.68/fs/buffer.c linux-aio-2568/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.5.68/fs/buffer.c	Mon Apr 21 23:30:33 2003
+++ linux-aio-2568/fs/buffer.c	Mon Apr 21 17:26:58 2003
@@ -118,23 +118,35 @@
  * from becoming locked again - you have to lock it yourself
  * if you want to preserve its state.
  */
-void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+int __wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head * bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
 {
 	wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bh_waitq_head(bh);
-	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+	DEFINE_WAIT(local_wait);
+
+	if (!wait)
+		wait = &local_wait;
 
 	if (atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == 0 &&
 			(!bh->b_page || !PageLocked(bh->b_page)))
 		buffer_error();
 
 	do {
-		prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		prepare_to_wait(wqh, wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
 			blk_run_queues();
+			if (!is_sync_wait(wait)) {
+				return -EIOCBRETRY;
+			}
 			io_schedule();
 		}
 	} while (buffer_locked(bh));
-	finish_wait(wqh, &wait);
+	finish_wait(wqh, wait);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+{
+	__wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, NULL);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1190,9 +1202,12 @@
 	__brelse(bh);
 }
 
-static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, 
+		wait_queue_t *wait)
 {
-	lock_buffer(bh);
+	if (-EIOCBRETRY == lock_buffer_wq(bh, wait))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBRETRY);
+
 	if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
 		unlock_buffer(bh);
 		return bh;
@@ -1202,7 +1217,8 @@
 		get_bh(bh);
 		bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_io_sync;
 		submit_bh(READ, bh);
-		wait_on_buffer(bh);
+		if (-EIOCBRETRY == wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait))
+			return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBRETRY);
 		if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
 			return bh;
 	}
@@ -1210,6 +1226,11 @@
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+	return __bread_slow_wq(bh, NULL);
+}
+	
 /*
  * Per-cpu buffer LRU implementation.  To reduce the cost of __find_get_block().
  * The bhs[] array is sorted - newest buffer is at bhs[0].  Buffers have their
@@ -1384,6 +1405,18 @@
 		bh = __bread_slow(bh);
 	return bh;
 }
+
+
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_wq(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size,
+	wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size);
+
+	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
+		bh = __bread_slow_wq(bh, wait);
+	return bh;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
 
 /*
@@ -1822,8 +1855,11 @@
 			clear_buffer_new(bh);
 		if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
 			err = get_block(inode, block, bh, 1);
-			if (err)
+			if (err) {
+				if (-EIOCBRETRY == err)
+					pr_debug("get_block queued\n");
 				goto out;
+			}
 			if (buffer_new(bh)) {
 				clear_buffer_new(bh);
 				unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev,
@@ -1865,6 +1901,8 @@
 	 * If we issued read requests - let them complete.
 	 */
 	while(wait_bh > wait) {
+		if (!is_sync_wait(current->io_wait))
+			printk("block_prepare_write: wait on buffer\n");
 		wait_on_buffer(*--wait_bh);
 		if (!buffer_uptodate(*wait_bh))
 			return -EIO;
diff -ur -X /home/kiran/dontdiff linux-2.5.68/include/linux/buffer_head.h linux-aio-2568/include/linux/buffer_head.h
--- linux-2.5.68/include/linux/buffer_head.h	Fri Apr 11 21:10:51 2003
+++ linux-aio-2568/include/linux/buffer_head.h	Wed Apr 16 16:31:12 2003
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@
 void __invalidate_buffers(kdev_t dev, int);
 int sync_blockdev(struct block_device *bdev);
 void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *);
+int __wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *, wait_queue_t *wait);
 wait_queue_head_t *bh_waitq_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
 void wake_up_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh);
 int fsync_bdev(struct block_device *);
@@ -172,6 +173,8 @@
 void __brelse(struct buffer_head *);
 void __bforget(struct buffer_head *);
 struct buffer_head *__bread(struct block_device *, sector_t block, int size);
+struct buffer_head *__bread_wq(struct block_device *, sector_t block, 
+	int size, wait_queue_t *wait);
 struct buffer_head *alloc_buffer_head(void);
 void free_buffer_head(struct buffer_head * bh);
 void FASTCALL(unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh));
@@ -229,13 +232,13 @@
 
 static inline void brelse(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	if (bh)
+	if (bh && !IS_ERR(bh))
 		__brelse(bh);
 }
 
 static inline void bforget(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	if (bh)
+	if (bh && !IS_ERR(bh))
 		__bforget(bh);
 }
 
@@ -246,7 +249,12 @@
 }
 
 static inline struct buffer_head *
-sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
+sb_bread_wq(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	return __bread_wq(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize, wait);
+}
+
+static inline struct buffer_head *sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
 {
 	return __getblk(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
 }
@@ -276,10 +284,26 @@
 		__wait_on_buffer(bh);
 }
 
+static inline int wait_on_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	if (buffer_locked(bh))
+		return __wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
 	while (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
 		__wait_on_buffer(bh);
 }
 
+static inline int lock_buffer_wq(struct buffer_head *bh, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+	if (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
+		return __wait_on_buffer_wq(bh, wait);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BUFFER_HEAD_H */

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Labs, India

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-24  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-24  4:52 Filesystem AIO read-write patches Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  4:52 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - aio retry core changes Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:00   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - aio read Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:04   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:11 ` Filesystem AIO read-write patches Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:11   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24 12:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-24 12:48     ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-24  5:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - async down (x86) Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:16   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:19 ` [5/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - use down_wq for aio write Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:19   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:21 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2003-04-24  5:21   ` [PATCH 6/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr - async bread Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24  5:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] Filesystem AIO rdwr: async get block for ext2 Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-24 13:13 ` Filesystem AIO read-write patches Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-24 14:27   ` Suparna Bhattacharya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030424105119.F2288@in.ibm.com \
    --to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.