Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Jonathan Sambrook]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]

Hi,

As ever the Linux lockin bites:

	My hardware needs 2.4.21 and my development work (now) needs reiserfs +
quota.

Any idea if/when to expect an updated patch?

Regards,
Jonathan

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Chris Mason]

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:24, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As ever the Linux lockin bites:
> 
> 	My hardware needs 2.4.21 and my development work (now) needs reiserfs +
> quota.
> 
> Any idea if/when to expect an updated patch?

I've got Oleg's merge of the data logging code at

ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21

-chris

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Ookhoi]

Chris Mason wrote (ao):
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:24, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
> > As ever the Linux lockin bites:
> > 
> > 	My hardware needs 2.4.21 and my development work (now) needs
> > 	reiserfs + quota.
> > 
> > Any idea if/when to expect an updated patch?
> 
> I've got Oleg's merge of the data logging code at
> 
> ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21

Chris, thanks a lot. Your patches on 2.4.21 make quota work here. Very
nice.

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Christian Mayrhuber]

Am Montag, 16. Juni 2003 13:44 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:24, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As ever the Linux lockin bites:
> >
> > 	My hardware needs 2.4.21 and my development work (now) needs reiserfs +
> > quota.
> >
> > Any idea if/when to expect an updated patch?
>
> I've got Oleg's merge of the data logging code at
>
> ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
>
> -chris

What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff
-- 
lg, Chris

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Chris Mason]

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:45, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:

> 
> What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
> I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
> been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff

Whoops, I screwed that up.

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Philippe Gramoullé]

Hello Chris,

On 16 Jun 2003 10:56:19 -0400
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:

  | On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:45, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
  | 
  | > 
  | > What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
  | > I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
  | > been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff
  | 
  | Whoops, I screwed that up.

Which one ? The README or the 10-xx.diff patch itself ?

Thanks,

Philippe

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Gerrit Hannaert]

Hello Chris,
I don't use the quota patches myself (any more), but every time there is
a new kernel release or pre-release this question (and the data-logging
one) is inevitably asked on this list. Are there any plans to merge
these into the mainstream kernel? Perhaps now 2.4.21 is out it can get
some more testing in the next -pre series?

>I've got Oleg's merge of the data logging code at
>
>ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 <ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21>
>
>-chris
>

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Chris Mason]

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:12, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> 
> On 16 Jun 2003 10:56:19 -0400
> Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
> 
>   | On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:45, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
>   | 
>   | > 
>   | > What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
>   | > I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
>   | > been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff
>   | 
>   | Whoops, I screwed that up.
> 
> Which one ? The README or the 10-xx.diff patch itself ?

The ftp directory now has 10-reiserfs-quota-link-fix.diff.gz as well,
you need both of them.  Sorry for the delayed response, having some
hardware issues today I'll have to sort it all out in the morning.

-chris

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Brian Tinsley]

Everything running very well (as expected) here! Great job to all!


--
Brian Tinsley
Chief Systems Engineer
Emageon

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Philippe Gramoullé]

Hello Chris,

Just to be complete, shouldn't the README have a reference to 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff.gz ?
(provided this patch still needs to be applied)

Thanks,

Philippe

On 16 Jun 2003 22:09:03 -0400
Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:

  | On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:12, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
  | > Hello Chris,
  | > 
  | > On 16 Jun 2003 10:56:19 -0400
  | > Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
  | > 
  | >   | On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:45, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
  | >   | 
  | >   | > 
  | >   | > What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
  | >   | > I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
  | >   | > been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff
  | >   | 
  | >   | Whoops, I screwed that up.
  | > 
  | > Which one ? The README or the 10-xx.diff patch itself ?
  | 
  | The ftp directory now has 10-reiserfs-quota-link-fix.diff.gz as well,
  | you need both of them.  Sorry for the delayed response, having some
  | hardware issues today I'll have to sort it all out in the morning.
  | 
  | -chris
  | 
  | 
  | 

Re: Timeframe for 2.4.21 quota patches?

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:13:35AM +0200, Gerrit Hannaert wrote:

> I don't use the quota patches myself (any more), but every time there is
> a new kernel release or pre-release this question (and the data-logging
> one) is inevitably asked on this list. Are there any plans to merge
> these into the mainstream kernel? Perhaps now 2.4.21 is out it can get
> some more testing in the next -pre series?

Yes, there are plans to merge this to mainline starting from now.
Though Marcelo have announced this release to be "quick", so it
is not clean if he will accept large pages.

Bye,
    Oleg