Re: rebased cpufreq patch?

Re: rebased cpufreq patch?

[Dominik Brodowski]

> Hi there,
> 
> Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
> 2.4.22-pre3 ?

I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please.

> I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
> cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
> any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
> if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.

IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4.
in general?

	Dominik

Re: rebased cpufreq patch?

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
 > > Hi there,
 > > 
 > > Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
 > > 2.4.22-pre3 ?
 > 
 > I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check
 > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please.
 > 
 > > I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
 > > cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
 > > any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
 > > if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.
 > 
 > IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4.
 > in general?

I've no objection really, but it does mean that we would be introducing
an already obsolete interface into mainline. (~Not htat that's really a
problem, we did already for 2.5 anyway).

        Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

Re: rebased cpufreq patch?

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 19:38, Dave Jones wrote:

> I've no objection really, but it does mean that we would be introducing
> an already obsolete interface into mainline. (~Not htat that's really a
> problem, we did already for 2.5 anyway).

I'd like to see the core in asap, if possible for .22, and I don't
care that much about the interface right now...

The point is that a bunch of recent Apple laptops boot at low speed
by default, and the only way I provide to switch them to full speed
is via cpufreq...  That's one of the few bits still preventing me
to fully merge my "powermac" kernels into mainline.

Ben.

rebased cpufreq patch?

[Anders Karlsson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]

Hi there,

Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
2.4.22-pre3 ?

I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.

Regards,

/A



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: rebased cpufreq patch?

[Bill Nottingham]

Anders Karlsson (anders@trudheim.com) said: 
> Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
> 2.4.22-pre3 ?
> 
> I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
> cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
> any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
> if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.

I believe it's been integrated into the -ac series; that may be
a better place to get it.

Bill