[parisc-linux] update of libc?

[parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Tilo Riemer]

Hello,

is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x?
At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host.


Best regards, Tilo

Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-09-18 11:31:57 +0200, Tilo Riemer <t.riemer@visoel.de>
wrote in message <20030918113157.000037fb.t.riemer@visoel.de>:
> is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x?
> At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host.

I've just dist-upgrade'd all my machines. Libc still works (including a
B132L+ and a 712), but you should be aware of module-init-tools if
you're already using 2.6.x.

# touch /etc/modprobe.d/arch/generic 

...helps you over a bug in the .deb ...

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Tilo Riemer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x?
> At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host.

There is no 2.3.x glibc available for debian, it's currently being
fixed. I apologize for the delay, it's more difficult than usual.

c.

Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1332 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-09-18 12:02:49 -0400, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
wrote in message <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted>:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Tilo Riemer wrote:
> > is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x?
> > At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host.
> 
> There is no 2.3.x glibc available for debian, it's currently being
> fixed. I apologize for the delay, it's more difficult than usual.

No?

b132l-1:~# dpkg -l libc6
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  libc6          2.3.1-17.0.3   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

For me, that one works and seems to be 2.3.x... However, what are
current libc's problems?

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:31:33PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-18 12:02:49 -0400, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
> wrote in message <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted>:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Tilo Riemer wrote:
> > > is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x?
> > > At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host.
> > 
> > There is no 2.3.x glibc available for debian, it's currently being
> > fixed. I apologize for the delay, it's more difficult than usual.
> 
> No?

Sorry, 2.3.2, my brain isn't responding to the usual shock treatment.

c.

Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc?

[Tilo Riemer]

Hello,

thanks for all hints.

I could update to libc 2.3 without problems. All seems to work...


Best regards, Tilo