[PATCH] i2c-sis630 fixes for 2.6.0-test7

[PATCH] i2c-sis630 fixes for 2.6.0-test7

[Alexander Malysh]

Hi Greg,

attached you can find a patch that should fix i2c-sis630 driver for 2.6.0-X 
kernel. With i2c-sis630 from stock 2.6.0-X we have oops and driver was not 
correct registered against i2c-core.

Changes:
	1) fixed a oops while modprobing
	2) added check for buffer overflow for i2c block data read transaction
	3) added 'force' modprobe parameter. It's allow more easily testing for not 
yet supported SiS chips.

Please apply... Thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2c-sis630.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 5640 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20031010/3ae9d41c/i2c-sis630.bin

[PATCH] i2c-sis630 fixes for 2.6.0-test7

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> attached you can find a patch that should fix i2c-sis630 driver for 2.6.0-X 
> kernel. With i2c-sis630 from stock 2.6.0-X we have oops and driver was not 
> correct registered against i2c-core.
> 
> Changes:
> 	1) fixed a oops while modprobing
> 	2) added check for buffer overflow for i2c block data read transaction
> 	3) added 'force' modprobe parameter. It's allow more easily testing for not 
> yet supported SiS chips.
> 
> Please apply... Thanks.

Why did you add a printk() call right before a call to dev_err()?  Can
you remove that change and resubmit the patch?

thanks,

greg k-h

[PATCH] i2c-sis630 fixes for 2.6.0-test7

[Alexander Malysh]

On Friday 10 October 2003 19:15, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > attached you can find a patch that should fix i2c-sis630 driver for
> > 2.6.0-X kernel. With i2c-sis630 from stock 2.6.0-X we have oops and
> > driver was not correct registered against i2c-core.
> >
> > Changes:
> > 	1) fixed a oops while modprobing
> > 	2) added check for buffer overflow for i2c block data read transaction
> > 	3) added 'force' modprobe parameter. It's allow more easily testing for
> > not yet supported SiS chips.
> >
> > Please apply... Thanks.
>
> Why did you add a printk() call right before a call to dev_err()?  Can
> you remove that change and resubmit the patch?

oops, sorry. It was for debugging...
corrected patch attached.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

-- 
Best regards,
Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2c-sis630.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 5604 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20031010/7acdd40a/i2c-sis630.bin

[PATCH] i2c-sis630 fixes for 2.6.0-test7

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:23:21PM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 19:15, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > attached you can find a patch that should fix i2c-sis630 driver for
> > > 2.6.0-X kernel. With i2c-sis630 from stock 2.6.0-X we have oops and
> > > driver was not correct registered against i2c-core.
> > >
> > > Changes:
> > > 	1) fixed a oops while modprobing
> > > 	2) added check for buffer overflow for i2c block data read transaction
> > > 	3) added 'force' modprobe parameter. It's allow more easily testing for
> > > not yet supported SiS chips.
> > >
> > > Please apply... Thanks.
> >
> > Why did you add a printk() call right before a call to dev_err()?  Can
> > you remove that change and resubmit the patch?
> 
> oops, sorry. It was for debugging...
> corrected patch attached.

Thanks, I've applied this and will send it on up the food chain.

greg k-h