Re: Linux 2.4 future

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>]

Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> 
> > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu:
> > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of
> > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the
> > > chair and the keyboard.
> > 
> > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a
> > kernel that is phasing out?
> 
> Because it is _not_.

So what? You disagree, what is the problem of keeping a patch out of the tree
if the tree is getting in deep freeze?
 
> I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ...
> 
> Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ?
> 
> Please stay serious.

I'm staying, please stay too.

And I was on this list _way_ before 2.4.11, 2.6 has, IMHO, a different story.

- Arnaldo