All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: willy@debian.org, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:52:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040128225205.02193769.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401281340301.28145@home.osdl.org>

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:


> Again, this is all depending on hardware implementation issues. It is 
> entirely possible that "read_pcix_error()" has to do some kind of 
> synchronization to make sure that any async operations have finished and 
> all errors have been accounted for.

I have no idea how to do such an synchronization on i386/x86-64. E.g. Opteron
chipsets would likely support MCEs for bus aborts, but there is no way to 
synchronize it for writes.

-Andi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: willy@debian.org, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:52:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040128225205.02193769.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401281340301.28145@home.osdl.org>

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:


> Again, this is all depending on hardware implementation issues. It is 
> entirely possible that "read_pcix_error()" has to do some kind of 
> synchronization to make sure that any async operations have finished and 
> all errors have been accounted for.

I have no idea how to do such an synchronization on i386/x86-64. E.g. Opteron
chipsets would likely support MCEs for bus aborts, but there is no way to 
synchronize it for writes.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-28 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-28  1:54 [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation Hironobu Ishii
2004-01-28  1:54 ` Hironobu Ishii
2004-01-28  2:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28  2:55   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28  4:44   ` Paul Mackerras
2004-01-28  4:44     ` Paul Mackerras
2004-01-28  8:58   ` Russell King
2004-01-28 16:15     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 16:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 17:01     ` Grant Grundler
2004-01-28 17:01       ` Grant Grundler
2004-01-28 18:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-01-28 19:19     ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 19:19       ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 19:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 19:33       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 19:40       ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 19:40         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 20:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 20:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 20:15           ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 20:15             ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 20:19             ` [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation II Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 20:19               ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 20:28             ` [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 20:28               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 20:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 20:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 21:09               ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 21:09                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 21:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 21:43                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 21:52                   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-01-28 21:52                     ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 22:21                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 22:21                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 22:39                       ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 22:39                         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-28 22:59                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-28 22:59                           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-29 12:24                           ` Hironobu Ishii
2004-01-29 12:24                             ` Hironobu Ishii
2004-01-28 22:15                   ` David S. Miller
2004-01-28 22:15                     ` David S. Miller
2004-01-28  3:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-01-28  3:09   ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040128225205.02193769.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.