All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: rihad <rihad@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel-digest@lists.us.dell.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 021 release
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:52:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040310225237.GE24336@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404D9966.6080903@mail.ru>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:16:06PM +0400, rihad wrote:
> 
> Does the devfs/udev /dev entry get removed when doing rmmod? I though 
> not.

Yes it does.  If the sysfs entry goes away.

> But since the module isn't there anymore, doing mount /dev/cdrom 
> /cdrom would give "No such device". Not a problem per se, but then 
> probably rmmod -a isn't as a wise thing to do with udev as it is with 
> devfs. Bad.

rmmod -a has not been a wise thing to do since 2.2 came out.  It can
easily take down a working box...

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: rihad <rihad@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel-digest@lists.us.dell.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 021 release
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:52:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040310225237.GE24336@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404D9966.6080903@mail.ru>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:16:06PM +0400, rihad wrote:
> 
> Does the devfs/udev /dev entry get removed when doing rmmod? I though 
> not.

Yes it does.  If the sysfs entry goes away.

> But since the module isn't there anymore, doing mount /dev/cdrom 
> /cdrom would give "No such device". Not a problem per se, but then 
> probably rmmod -a isn't as a wise thing to do with udev as it is with 
> devfs. Bad.

rmmod -a has not been a wise thing to do since 2.2 came out.  It can
easily take down a working box...

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-10 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040303153403.21649.81059.Mailman@linux.us.dell.com>
     [not found] ` <4048D503.10808@mail.ru>
2004-03-09  8:19   ` [ANNOUNCE] udev 021 release Greg KH
2004-03-09  8:19     ` Greg KH
2004-03-09 10:16     ` rihad
2004-03-09 10:16       ` rihad
2004-03-09 13:43       ` Alex Goddard
2004-03-09 13:43         ` Alex Goddard
2004-03-10 22:52       ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-03-10 22:52         ` Greg KH
     [not found] <fa.fkf6pbs.vk4328@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.aj3o3v7.pgqn9l@ifi.uio.no>
2004-03-10 23:01   ` walt
2004-03-11  0:11     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11  0:11       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
     [not found] <fa.dbn18ei.1k46o3i@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.afjk56q.t0ulic@ifi.uio.no>
2004-03-10 13:02   ` walt
2004-03-10 13:02     ` walt
2004-03-10 21:01     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 21:01       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
     [not found] <1vshj-2ou-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <1vBuj-3YL-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-03 13:51   ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-03-03  0:09 Greg KH
2004-03-03  0:09 ` Greg KH
2004-03-03  0:25 ` Greg KH
2004-03-03  0:25   ` Greg KH
2004-03-03  1:16 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-03  3:09 ` Greg KH
2004-03-03  9:56 ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-03  9:56   ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-03 12:22   ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-03-03 12:22     ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-03-03 15:14     ` Greg KH
2004-03-03 15:14       ` Greg KH
2004-03-03 19:28       ` David Brownell
2004-03-03 19:28         ` David Brownell
2004-03-03 22:53       ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-03 22:53         ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-04  1:25         ` Greg KH
2004-03-04  1:25           ` Greg KH
2004-03-04  3:58           ` Bill Nottingham
2004-03-04  3:58             ` Bill Nottingham
2004-03-04 18:26             ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 18:26               ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 11:30           ` Romano Giannetti
2004-03-04  1:22       ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-04  1:22         ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-04  1:28         ` Greg KH
2004-03-04  1:28           ` Greg KH
2004-03-04  9:27           ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-04  9:27             ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-03 15:15   ` Greg KH
2004-03-03 15:15     ` Greg KH
2004-03-03 23:56     ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-03 23:56       ` Michael Weiser
2004-03-04  1:19       ` Greg KH
2004-03-04  1:19         ` Greg KH
2004-03-03 10:19 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-03 10:52 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-03 11:02 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-03 15:49 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-04  1:18 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-04  6:37 ` Dominik Kubla
2004-03-04 18:44   ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 18:44     ` Greg KH
2004-03-05  7:22     ` Dominik Kubla
2004-03-10 22:53       ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 22:53         ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 17:48 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-03-04 18:46   ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 18:46     ` Greg KH
2004-03-04 18:56     ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-03-09 11:51 ` "Andrey Borzenkov" 
2004-03-10  2:34 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-03-10 12:29 ` "Andrey Borzenkov" 
2004-03-10 12:56 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 12:56   ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 22:51   ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 22:51     ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 23:17     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 23:17       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11  1:21       ` Greg KH
2004-03-11  1:21         ` Greg KH
2004-03-13  9:34         ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-13  9:34           ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11  3:30 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-03-11  9:22 ` "Andrey Borzenkov" 
2004-03-12 23:39 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040310225237.GE24336@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel-digest@lists.us.dell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rihad@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.