* 2.6.4 corruption
@ 2004-03-22 0:55 Tom Vier
2004-03-22 1:23 ` Tom Vier
2004-03-22 11:21 ` Dieter Nützel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Vier @ 2004-03-22 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
after rebooting (no umount, sysreq wouldn't respond) due to a radeon
problem, some files had their data blocks switched. one file was truncated,
and what was truncated (it's mounted notail, btw) was attached to another
file. one file was completely corrupt. this isn't considered normal
behavior, i assume.
i'm currently bootstrapping an altroot, so i can run reiserfsck.
--
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.4 corruption
2004-03-22 0:55 2.6.4 corruption Tom Vier
@ 2004-03-22 1:23 ` Tom Vier
2004-03-22 11:21 ` Dieter Nützel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Vier @ 2004-03-22 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
reiserfsck shows no corruption, so the metadata is at least intact.
--
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.4 corruption
2004-03-22 0:55 2.6.4 corruption Tom Vier
2004-03-22 1:23 ` Tom Vier
@ 2004-03-22 11:21 ` Dieter Nützel
2004-03-23 0:08 ` Tom Vier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Nützel @ 2004-03-22 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Vier; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Am Montag, 22. März 2004 01:55 schrieb Tom Vier:
> after rebooting (no umount, sysreq wouldn't respond) due to a radeon
> problem, some files had their data blocks switched. one file was truncated,
> and what was truncated (it's mounted notail, btw) was attached to another
> file. one file was completely corrupt. this isn't considered normal
> behavior, i assume.
>
> i'm currently bootstrapping an altroot, so i can run reiserfsck.
Use the data-logging patches for 2.6.4 up or "wait" or 2.6.5/2.6.6.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107967943828838&w=2
and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107981018429164&w=2
BTW I'm with DRI-Devel since the beginning and data-logging WORKS even with
2.4.
Regards,
Dieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.4 corruption
2004-03-22 11:21 ` Dieter Nützel
@ 2004-03-23 0:08 ` Tom Vier
2004-03-23 0:28 ` Vince
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Vier @ 2004-03-23 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> Use the data-logging patches for 2.6.4 up or "wait" or 2.6.5/2.6.6.
i'm getting rejects using:
for i in `cat /pkgs/linux/reiserfs/mason/data-logging/2.6.4/series`; do \
patch -p1 --dry-run < /pkgs/linux/reiserfs/mason/data-logging/2.6.4/$i; done
patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 678.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 690 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 704.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/stree.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/journal.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
patching file fs/reiserfs/journal.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 408 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 443 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2048 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2284 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2478 (offset -2 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 58 (offset 1 line).
patching file fs/reiserfs/prints.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
patching file fs/reiserfs/journal.c
Hunk #8 succeeded at 534 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 561 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 586 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 627 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 712 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 726 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 916 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 953 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 994 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1028 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1066 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1080 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1100 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1141 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1162 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #23 succeeded at 1177 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1460 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1594 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1634 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1662 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #28 succeeded at 1830 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #29 succeeded at 1890 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #30 succeeded at 1918 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #31 succeeded at 1972 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #32 succeeded at 2082 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #33 succeeded at 2093 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #34 succeeded at 2202 (offset 47 lines).
Hunk #35 succeeded at 2219 (offset 48 lines).
Hunk #36 succeeded at 2233 (offset 48 lines).
Hunk #37 succeeded at 2243 (offset 48 lines).
Hunk #38 FAILED at 2262.
Hunk #39 succeeded at 2298 (offset 45 lines).
Hunk #40 succeeded at 2336 with fuzz 2 (offset 45 lines).
Hunk #41 FAILED at 2351.
Hunk #42 succeeded at 2428 with fuzz 1 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #43 succeeded at 2443 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #44 FAILED at 2461.
Hunk #45 succeeded at 2486 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #46 succeeded at 2525 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #47 succeeded at 2571 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #48 succeeded at 2596 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #49 succeeded at 2649 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #50 succeeded at 2719 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #51 succeeded at 2736 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #52 succeeded at 2746 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #53 succeeded at 2784 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #54 succeeded at 2824 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #55 succeeded at 2848 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #56 succeeded at 2880 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #57 succeeded at 2889 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #58 succeeded at 2977 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #59 FAILED at 3028.
Hunk #60 succeeded at 3050 (offset -9 lines).
Hunk #61 succeeded at 3081 with fuzz 1 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #62 succeeded at 3098 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #63 succeeded at 3132 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #64 succeeded at 3148 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #65 succeeded at 3161 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #66 succeeded at 3168 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #67 succeeded at 3204 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #68 succeeded at 3226 (offset -12 lines).
4 out of 68 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/journal.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/objectid.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/procfs.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 969 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1626 (offset 5 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 30.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c.rej
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
Hunk #3 FAILED at 154.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 157 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 198 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 219 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 408 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #8 FAILED at 463.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 473 (offset -3 lines).
2 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h.rej
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1701 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1747 (offset 1 line).
patching file fs/reiserfs/journal.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 54.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 596.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 845 with fuzz 2 (offset -54 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 906.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1100.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1339.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1373.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 2096.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 2319 (offset -62 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 2493 with fuzz 2 (offset -99 lines).
Hunk #11 FAILED at 2676.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 2687.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 2788 with fuzz 2 (offset -114 lines).
Hunk #14 FAILED at 2803.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 3208.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 3385.
Hunk #17 FAILED at 3474.
13 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/journal.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 506 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 668 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 742 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 847 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1340 (offset -3 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 155 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 173 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 199 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 211 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 227 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 301 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 331 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 341 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 373 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 437 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 448 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 479 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 521 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 535 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 599 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 666 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 685 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1083 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1119 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1221 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1244 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #23 succeeded at 1256 (offset -1 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 110 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 554.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 563 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 591 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 612 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 638 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #10 FAILED at 680.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 703 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 733 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 759 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 774 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 806 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 869 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 900 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 918 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 932 with fuzz 2 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 2022 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #21 succeeded at 2235 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #22 succeeded at 2283 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #23 succeeded at 2306 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #24 succeeded at 2378 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 2495 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 2529 (offset 8 lines).
2 out of 26 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/inode.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
patching file fs/buffer.c
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h.rej
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1148 with fuzz 2 (offset -559 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1176.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1762 with fuzz 2 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1772 (offset -14 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h.rej
patching file fs/Kconfig
patching file fs/reiserfs/Makefile
patching file fs/reiserfs/dir.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 99 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1161 (offset -80 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 41 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1055 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2386 (offset -109 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 965 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1351 (offset 19 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 354 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 668 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 788 (offset -40 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 805 (offset -40 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 823 with fuzz 2 (offset -39 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 846 with fuzz 2 (offset -40 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1279 (offset -40 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 1425.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 1498 (offset -53 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 1510 (offset -53 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1523 (offset -53 lines).
1 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/super.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/xattr_user.c
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1914 (offset -46 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1966 (offset -46 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2185 (offset -46 lines).
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 20 (offset -2 lines).
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
Hunk #2 succeeded at 260 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 403 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 449.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 476.
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h.rej
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
patching file fs/Kconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 244 with fuzz 2 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 294 (offset -10 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 9 with fuzz 2 (offset -4 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 5.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/file.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 5.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 977.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1633 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1719 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2399 with fuzz 2 (offset -164 lines).
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/inode.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 15.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 566 (offset -14 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 575.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 624 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 636 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 687 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 701 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 717 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 970 (offset -5 lines).
2 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/namei.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 17.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 419 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 461 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 484 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 687.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 838.
3 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/super.c.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 312
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.3.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|+++ linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
10 out of 10 hunks ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
can't find file to patch at input line 1035
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr_user.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.3.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr_user.c
|+++ linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr_user.c
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_acl.h
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 52.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h.rej
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 442.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 470.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 1209
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.3/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.3.orig/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|+++ linux-2.6.3/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 631 (offset -36 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/Makefile.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 18
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.3.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|+++ linux-2.6.3/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c
can't find file to patch at input line 116
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.3/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.3.orig/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|+++ linux-2.6.3/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 13.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/Makefile.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 20
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux.lkcd.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-02-20 21:31:14.000000000 -0500
|+++ linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-02-20 21:31:57.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c
patching file fs/Kconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 244 with fuzz 2 (offset -22 lines).
can't find file to patch at input line 131
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux.lkcd/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|===================================================================
|--- linux.lkcd.orig/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h 2004-02-20 21:31:14.000000000 -0500
|+++ linux.lkcd/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h 2004-02-20 21:31:57.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux.lkcd.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c 2004-02-20 21:27:44.000000000 -0500
|+++ linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c 2004-02-20 21:32:06.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 979.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1642.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/inode.c.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 62
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux.lkcd.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-02-20 21:31:57.000000000 -0500
|+++ linux.lkcd/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-02-20 21:32:06.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
13 out of 13 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 199
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux.lkcd/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h
|===================================================================
|--- linux.lkcd.orig/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h 2004-02-20 21:31:57.000000000 -0500
|+++ linux.lkcd/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h 2004-02-20 21:32:06.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 24.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 56.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/reiserfs_fs_i.h.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/tail_conversion.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/namei.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 2 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 505 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 514 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 529 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 557 (offset -15 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 800 (offset -42 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 886 (offset -38 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1308 (offset -31 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 109 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 295 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 338 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 665 (offset -47 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 13.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 256.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 286.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 403.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 434.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 444.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 489.
7 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/file.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2506 (offset 13 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 4 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 36 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 643 with fuzz 2 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 651 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 685.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 731.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 773.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 782.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 814 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #10 FAILED at 861.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 907.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 938 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 1052 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1092 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1119 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1127 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1144 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1152 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1160 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1170 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1185 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1245 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #23 succeeded at 1528 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1573 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1610 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1678 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1721 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #28 succeeded at 1747 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #29 succeeded at 1760 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #30 succeeded at 1792 (offset -26 lines).
Hunk #31 FAILED at 2314.
Hunk #32 FAILED at 2341.
Hunk #33 FAILED at 2557.
9 out of 33 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/inode.c.rej
patching file fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1257 (offset 23 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1270 (offset 23 lines).
patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1843 (offset -46 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1866 (offset -46 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1911 (offset -46 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2094 (offset -48 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 216 (offset 43 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/super.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1342.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/super.c.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: linux-2.6.0/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
|===================================================================
|--- linux-2.6.0.orig/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-01-05 12:59:45.000000000 +0100
|+++ linux-2.6.0/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c 2004-01-05 13:00:00.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1191 (offset 43 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1207 (offset 43 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/tail_conversion.c
patching file fs/reiserfs/inode.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2037 (offset -89 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2084 (offset -89 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 280 (offset 37 lines).
patching file fs/reiserfs/journal.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 788.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 802.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 823.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 3069 with fuzz 1 (offset -390 lines).
3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/journal.c.rej
--
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.4 corruption
2004-03-23 0:08 ` Tom Vier
@ 2004-03-23 0:28 ` Vince
2004-03-23 0:50 ` Tom Vier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vince @ 2004-03-23 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Vier; +Cc: Reiserfs mail-list
Tom Vier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
>
>>Use the data-logging patches for 2.6.4 up or "wait" or 2.6.5/2.6.6.
>
>
> i'm getting rejects using:
>
> for i in `cat /pkgs/linux/reiserfs/mason/data-logging/2.6.4/series`; do \
> patch -p1 --dry-run < /pkgs/linux/reiserfs/mason/data-logging/2.6.4/$i; done
^^^^^^^^^
You should apply the patches for real:
> patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
... stree.c is modified here
> patching file include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
> patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
^^^^^^^
and it looks like the second patch depends on the first one when wanting
to modify the same file (therefore a reject with --dry-run)...
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 678.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 690 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 704.
> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/reiserfs/stree.c.rej
> patching file fs/reiserfs/stree.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-23 0:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-22 0:55 2.6.4 corruption Tom Vier
2004-03-22 1:23 ` Tom Vier
2004-03-22 11:21 ` Dieter Nützel
2004-03-23 0:08 ` Tom Vier
2004-03-23 0:28 ` Vince
2004-03-23 0:50 ` Tom Vier
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.