[LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Glen Mabey]

I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.

htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I
[think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate
limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would
invoke a warning message.

Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a
classid?

Thank you,
Glen Mabey

-- 
******************************************************************
Glen W. Mabey
Glen.Mabey@usu.edu
http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Catalin BOIE]

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:

> I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
> script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
>
> htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

What qdisc is attached to this class?

>
> I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I
> [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate
> limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would
> invoke a warning message.
>
> Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a
> classid?
>
> Thank you,
> Glen Mabey
>
> --
> ******************************************************************
> Glen W. Mabey
> Glen.Mabey@usu.edu
> http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
> ******************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

---
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
catab at deuroconsult.ro
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

RE: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Chris Bolton]

Hi all,

Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing.  I figured
I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0
xx.xx.xx.193 but once I've done that I've found out I cant use ip route to
configure it eg ip route add default dev eth0:0 table server.  Whats the
best way to go about this?

Cheers.

By the way I'm running redhat 9 with two adsl connections, on is a
speedtouch USB modem and the other is the EN5861 router.





_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Glen Mabey]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote:
> 
> >I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config
> >script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to.
> >
> >htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
> 
> What qdisc is attached to this class?

Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below.  I'm still trying to figure
out which class (in the <qdisc>:<classid> format) the error message is
referring to.  

So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb
qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention that I'm using
HTB), I'm not sure which qdisc this refers to.

> >I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I
> >[think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate
> >limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would
> >invoke a warning message.
> >
> >Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a
> >classid?

I'm just starting back on working on this problem this morning, and I'll
approach it via a process of elimination, but I just thought there
surely must be some sort of deterministic mapping between the
<qdisc>:<classid> label and this one given in the warning message.

Thank you --
Glen

-- 
******************************************************************
Glen W. Mabey
Glen.Mabey@usu.edu
http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Ed Wildgoose]

>Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I
>was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up
>the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing.  I figured
>I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0
>xx.xx.xx.193 but once I've done that I've found out I cant use ip route to
>configure it eg ip route add default dev eth0:0 table server.  Whats the
>best way to go about this?
>
>Cheers.
>
>By the way I'm running redhat 9 with two adsl connections, on is a
>speedtouch USB modem and the other is the EN5861 router.
>  
>

I'm not quite sure why you tagged this on to the end of a thread about 
htb classes?  As a result many people may not even read your question...? 

I have one of those EN5861 router things, and actually I find it pretty 
good.  The biggest issue is that it's a bit of a timebomb, the 
powersupply dies after a few years, and unless you have a spare it's a 
bit of a weak link

Do you need to do some particularly advanced routing that's stopping you 
just using the en5861?

Good luck

Ed W


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

[Catalin BOIE]

> Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below.  I'm still trying to figure
> out which class (in the <qdisc>:<classid> format) the error message is
> referring to.
It's about class 1:7.

> So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb
> qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention that I'm using
> HTB), I'm not sure which qdisc this refers to.
>
>>> I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I
>>> [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate
>>> limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would
>>> invoke a warning message.
>>>
>>> Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a
>>> classid?
>
> I'm just starting back on working on this problem this morning, and I'll
> approach it via a process of elimination, but I just thought there
> surely must be some sort of deterministic mapping between the
> <qdisc>:<classid> label and this one given in the warning message.
>
> Thank you --
> Glen
>
> --
> ******************************************************************
> Glen W. Mabey
> Glen.Mabey@usu.edu
> http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
> ******************************************************************
>

---
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
catab at deuroconsult.ro
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/