From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>, Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:32:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040705183219.GI2146@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040704072350.GA7060@suse.de>
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:23:50AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 04, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 15, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > And yes, passing -many does work on all older supported versions of
> > > binutils. So perhaps we should just add -Wa,-many to our cflags and be
> > > done with it now (and for future fixes of this sort).
> >
> > gcc 3.2 passes only -mppc, so all altive instructions will fail to
> > compile without either -many or -maltivec
> >
> > I have tested this patch with
> > gcc 3.2.3 + binutils-2.15.91.0.1
> > gcc 3.3.4 + binutils-2.15.91.0.1
> > gcc 3.4.1 + binutils-2.15.91.0.1
> > gcc 3.2.3 + binutils-2.15
> > gcc 3.3.4 + binutils-2.15
> > gcc 3.4.1 + binutils-2.15
>
> I meant to sent this version of the patch, really use -many also for the
> .S files.
[snip]
Kumar, Matt, can you give the following a shot on e500 and 4xx please?
This should fix Olaf's problem, and remove some workarounds for
previous binutils changes of this nature (to get 'foo' instruction, now
you must pass -mbar to the assembler):
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
===== arch/ppc/Makefile 1.54 vs edited =====
--- 1.54/arch/ppc/Makefile 2004-06-26 14:10:12 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/ppc/Makefile 2004-07-05 11:27:18 -07:00
@@ -15,17 +15,15 @@
LDFLAGS_vmlinux := -Ttext $(KERNELLOAD) -Bstatic
CPPFLAGS += -Iarch/$(ARCH)
-AFLAGS += -Iarch/$(ARCH)
+AFLAGS += -Iarch/$(ARCH) -Wa,-many
cflags-y += -Iarch/$(ARCH) -msoft-float -pipe \
- -ffixed-r2 -Wno-uninitialized -mmultiple
+ -ffixed-r2 -Wno-uninitialized -mmultiple -Wa,-many
CPP = $(CC) -E $(CFLAGS)
ifndef CONFIG_E500
cflags-y += -mstring
endif
-cflags-$(CONFIG_4xx) += -Wa,-m405
-cflags-$(CONFIG_E500) += -Wa,-me500
cflags-$(CONFIG_PPC64BRIDGE) += -Wa,-mppc64bridge
CFLAGS += $(cflags-y)
===== arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile 1.47 vs edited =====
--- 1.47/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile 2004-06-17 23:41:08 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile 2004-07-05 11:27:22 -07:00
@@ -5,12 +5,6 @@
ifdef CONFIG_PPC64BRIDGE
EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-mppc64bridge
endif
-ifdef CONFIG_4xx
-EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-m405
-endif
-ifdef CONFIG_E500
-EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-me500
-endif
extra-$(CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU) := head.o
extra-$(CONFIG_40x) := head_4xx.o
If this does take care of everything, Paul, is this OK with you?
(and it might also remove the need for the -mppc64bridge bit, if
you'd like to test that. :))
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-05 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-05 7:43 [PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 10:40 ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-05 11:11 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 13:11 ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-07 15:57 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-08 11:25 ` [PATCH] fix missing option " Olaf Hering
2004-06-10 0:16 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 9:15 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 16:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 17:38 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 18:07 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 20:55 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 21:19 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 16:12 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 17:25 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 17:46 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-03 22:29 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-04 1:30 ` Stef Simoens
2004-07-04 2:41 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-04 16:33 ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-07-25 6:07 ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 19:36 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-26 23:03 ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 23:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 7:23 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-05 18:32 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2004-07-09 1:34 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-09 1:43 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-12 9:06 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-12 15:11 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-12 18:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 13:49 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:01 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 14:02 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:20 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:18 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 15:26 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:29 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 19:45 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-14 23:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15 7:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-15 12:50 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:15 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15 14:24 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-05 18:18 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-10 16:19 Christian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040705183219.GI2146@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.