From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 18:43:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040709014300.GO23135@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040709013429.GN23135@smtp.west.cox.net>
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:34:29PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
[snip]
> OK. After giving this a whirl (after a NAK from Matt, privately), it looks
> like some versions of binutils don't make proper use of -many (in 2.14 it
> will override ppc_cpu, and PPC_OPCODE_ANY doesn't look to be used). So
> that brings us to the following patch. Olaf, can you please verify this
> still works for you? Paul, is this OK with you?
The other alternative, if we want to try and rely on -many working w/o
other flags passed is to depend on binutils-2.15* or newer.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-05 7:43 [PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 10:40 ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-05 11:11 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 13:11 ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-07 15:57 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-08 11:25 ` [PATCH] fix missing option " Olaf Hering
2004-06-10 0:16 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 9:15 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 16:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 17:38 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 18:07 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 20:55 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 21:19 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 16:12 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 17:25 ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 17:46 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-03 22:29 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-04 1:30 ` Stef Simoens
2004-07-04 2:41 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-04 16:33 ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-07-25 6:07 ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 19:36 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-26 23:03 ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 23:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 7:23 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-05 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-09 1:34 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-09 1:43 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2004-07-12 9:06 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-12 15:11 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-12 18:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 13:49 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:01 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 14:02 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:20 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:18 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 15:26 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:29 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 19:45 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-14 23:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15 7:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-15 12:50 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:15 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15 14:24 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-05 18:18 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-10 16:19 Christian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040709014300.GO23135@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.