All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Kernel-janitors] Re: sb1000.c::nicedelay() (msleep)
@ 2004-07-09  0:07 Steven N. Hirsch
  2004-07-11 10:19 ` maximilian attems
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven N. Hirsch @ 2004-07-09  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 576 bytes --]

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> So, this function (drivers/net/sb1000.c::nicedelay()) takes as parameter some
> value in usecs (which is also the name of the parameter). Then, it sleeps for
> 1 second (schedule_timeout(HZ)) regardless of the parameter. Is this desired?
> If so, I will replace the calls (all 3 of them) with msleep(). Or, should the
> passed in values (60000, 30000 and 200000) actually be being used and not
> ignored? Thanks.

Are these cards still being used?  I switched to 2-way cable almost (3) 
years ago and haven't looked back.  



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-11 10:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-09  0:07 [Kernel-janitors] Re: sb1000.c::nicedelay() (msleep) Steven N. Hirsch
2004-07-11 10:19 ` maximilian attems

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.