From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, devik@cdi.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6]: Make packet scheduler clock source configurable
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:31:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040721143110.4ab944bf.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40F4AC8B.40706@trash.net>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:46:19 +0200
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> This one actually compiles ;). The assembler of PSCHED_GET_TIME is
> exactly the same on x86. There are 10 architectures that return
> something non-zero for get_cycles(), but I have no idea if it is
> suitable on all of them. Patch applies on top of the dead-code
> removal patch.
This looks great.
As you mention some platforms return zero, for example sparc32,
for get_cycles().
I suggest we just expand the dependency list for NET_SCH_CLK_TSC
to include SPARC64 PPC64 and perhaps some other easy to verify
as having a working get_cycles() implementation. I believe that
as long as it increments at some rate >= jiffies, the psched
calibration will get things into a working state.
A lot of patches have been posted in this area and I'm losing
track of what to apply first etc. Can you repost your work
one change at a time? Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-21 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-13 2:21 [PATCH 2.6]: Make packet scheduler clock source configurable Patrick McHardy
2004-07-13 3:35 ` shemminger
2004-07-13 3:50 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <40F4862D.3070802@trash.net>
[not found] ` <40F4AC8B.40706@trash.net>
2004-07-21 21:31 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-07-22 23:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-23 0:17 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-23 0:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-23 1:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-23 1:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-23 17:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-23 17:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-07-23 20:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-23 23:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-25 6:27 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-25 21:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-26 0:02 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-23 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-23 23:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-13 16:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040721143110.4ab944bf.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.