From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/e100: replace schedule_timeout() with
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:55:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726235541.GI1897@us.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2520 bytes --]
I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the
task delays for the desired time.
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/net/e100.c 2004-06-16 05:20:26.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/net/e100.c 2004-07-12 18:59:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -613,8 +613,7 @@ static int e100_self_test(struct nic *ni
writel(selftest | dma_addr, &nic->csr->port);
e100_write_flush(nic);
/* Wait 10 msec for self-test to complete */
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
/* Interrupts are enabled after self-test */
e100_disable_irq(nic);
@@ -662,9 +661,8 @@ static void e100_eeprom_write(struct nic
e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
}
/* Wait 10 msec for cmd to complete */
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
-
+ msleep(10);
+
/* Chip deselect */
writeb(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
@@ -1734,8 +1732,7 @@ static int e100_loopback_test(struct nic
memset(skb->data, 0xFF, ETH_DATA_LEN);
e100_xmit_frame(skb, nic->netdev);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
if(memcmp(nic->rx_to_clean->skb->data + sizeof(struct rfd),
skb->data, ETH_DATA_LEN))
@@ -1821,8 +1818,7 @@ static void e100_get_regs(struct net_dev
mdio_read(netdev, nic->mii.phy_id, i);
memset(nic->mem->dump_buf, 0, sizeof(nic->mem->dump_buf));
e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_dump);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
memcpy(&buff[2 + E100_PHY_REGS], nic->mem->dump_buf,
sizeof(nic->mem->dump_buf));
}
@@ -1987,8 +1983,7 @@ static int e100_phys_id(struct net_devic
if(!data || data > (u32)(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ))
data = (u32)(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ);
mod_timer(&nic->blink_timer, jiffies);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(data * HZ);
+ msleep(data * 1000);
del_timer_sync(&nic->blink_timer);
mdio_write(netdev, nic->mii.phy_id, MII_LED_CONTROL, 0);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040726235541.GI1897@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.