* [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/e100: replace schedule_timeout() with
@ 2004-07-26 23:55 Nishanth Aravamudan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2004-07-26 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2520 bytes --]
I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the
task delays for the desired time.
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/net/e100.c 2004-06-16 05:20:26.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/net/e100.c 2004-07-12 18:59:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -613,8 +613,7 @@ static int e100_self_test(struct nic *ni
writel(selftest | dma_addr, &nic->csr->port);
e100_write_flush(nic);
/* Wait 10 msec for self-test to complete */
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
/* Interrupts are enabled after self-test */
e100_disable_irq(nic);
@@ -662,9 +661,8 @@ static void e100_eeprom_write(struct nic
e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
}
/* Wait 10 msec for cmd to complete */
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
-
+ msleep(10);
+
/* Chip deselect */
writeb(0, &nic->csr->eeprom_ctrl_lo);
e100_write_flush(nic); udelay(4);
@@ -1734,8 +1732,7 @@ static int e100_loopback_test(struct nic
memset(skb->data, 0xFF, ETH_DATA_LEN);
e100_xmit_frame(skb, nic->netdev);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
if(memcmp(nic->rx_to_clean->skb->data + sizeof(struct rfd),
skb->data, ETH_DATA_LEN))
@@ -1821,8 +1818,7 @@ static void e100_get_regs(struct net_dev
mdio_read(netdev, nic->mii.phy_id, i);
memset(nic->mem->dump_buf, 0, sizeof(nic->mem->dump_buf));
e100_exec_cb(nic, NULL, e100_dump);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(HZ / 100 + 1);
+ msleep(10);
memcpy(&buff[2 + E100_PHY_REGS], nic->mem->dump_buf,
sizeof(nic->mem->dump_buf));
}
@@ -1987,8 +1983,7 @@ static int e100_phys_id(struct net_devic
if(!data || data > (u32)(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ))
data = (u32)(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ);
mod_timer(&nic->blink_timer, jiffies);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(data * HZ);
+ msleep(data * 1000);
del_timer_sync(&nic->blink_timer);
mdio_write(netdev, nic->mii.phy_id, MII_LED_CONTROL, 0);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-07-26 23:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-26 23:55 [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/e100: replace schedule_timeout() with Nishanth Aravamudan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.