From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Eric Lammerts <eric@lammerts.org>,
Marc Ballarin <Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de>,
albert@users.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dynamic /dev security hole?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:54:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408091854.27019.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092057570.5761.215.camel@cube>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Quoting Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>:
> Pretty much, but you must change ownership first to
> keep the user from changing the mode back. There are
> ways for an evildoer to win this race if you don't
> change the ownership first.
>
> Now all we need is revoke() and we're all set.
> Ordering: chown, chmod, revoke, unlink
>
> BTW, I'm make revoke() just force re-verification
> of file access.
So what about this updated patch?
I'm running latest udev with klibc and my patch.
It seems to work. At least with my USB stick. :)
Greg? Any comments?
===== udev-remove.c 1.31 vs edited =====
- --- 1.31/udev-remove.c 2004-04-01 04:12:56 +02:00
+++ edited/udev-remove.c 2004-08-09 18:42:08 +02:00
@@ -65,6 +65,41 @@
return 0;
}
+/** Remove all permissions on the device node, before
+ * unlinking it. This fixes a security issue.
+ * If the user created a hard-link to the device node,
+ * he can't use it any longer, because he lost permission
+ * to do so.
+ */
+static int secure_unlink(const char *filename)
+{
+ int retval;
+
+ retval = chown(filename, 0, 0);
+ if (retval) {
+ dbg("chown(%s, 0, 0) failed with error '%s'",
+ filename, strerror(errno));
+ /* We continue nevertheless.
+ * I think it's very unlikely for chown
+ * to fail here, if the file exists.
+ */
+ }
+ retval = chmod(filename, 0000);
+ if (retval) {
+ dbg("chmod(%s, 0000) failed with error '%s'",
+ filename, strerror(errno));
+ /* We continue nevertheless. */
+ }
+ retval = unlink(filename);
+ if (errno == ENOENT)
+ retval = 0;
+ if (retval) {
+ dbg("unlink(%s) failed with error '%s'",
+ filename, strerror(errno));
+ }
+ return retval;
+}
+
static int delete_node(struct udevice *dev)
{
char filename[NAME_SIZE];
@@ -79,14 +114,9 @@
strfieldcat(filename, dev->name);
info("removing device node '%s'", filename);
- - retval = unlink(filename);
- - if (errno == ENOENT)
- - retval = 0;
- - if (retval) {
- - dbg("unlink(%s) failed with error '%s'",
- - filename, strerror(errno));
+ retval = secure_unlink(filename);
+ if (retval)
return retval;
- - }
/* remove partition nodes */
if (dev->partitions > 0) {
@@ -94,7 +124,7 @@
for (i = 1; i <= dev->partitions; i++) {
strfieldcpy(partitionname, filename);
strintcat(partitionname, i);
- - unlink(partitionname);
+ secure_unlink(partitionname);
}
}
@@ -108,14 +138,9 @@
strfieldcat(filename, linkname);
dbg("unlinking symlink '%s'", filename);
- - retval = unlink(filename);
- - if (errno == ENOENT)
- - retval = 0;
- - if (retval) {
- - dbg("unlink(%s) failed with error '%s'",
- - filename, strerror(errno));
+ retval = secure_unlink(filename);
+ if (retval)
return retval;
- - }
if (strchr(dev->symlink, '/')) {
delete_path(filename);
}
- --
Regards Michael Buesch [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBF6xAFGK1OIvVOP4RArfvAJwNf/CnIZTnEvUSNu3N4WI3tkqBOwCfe4B8
sM+KFpEX2PuDKsqcjTO9pV8=
=rd9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-08 12:47 dynamic /dev security hole? Albert Cahalan
2004-08-08 15:58 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-08 15:04 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-08 20:42 ` Greg KH
2004-08-08 16:21 ` Greg KH
2004-08-08 21:43 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-08 22:07 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-09 4:40 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 13:30 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-09 13:19 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-09 16:54 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2004-08-09 17:04 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 17:14 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-10 0:21 ` Greg KH
2004-08-11 17:12 ` [RFC, PATCH] sys_revoke(), just a try. (was: Re: dynamic /dev security hole?) Michael Buesch
2004-08-12 16:49 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-12 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-12 19:39 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-13 12:39 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-09 14:49 ` dynamic /dev security hole? Alan Cox
2004-08-09 16:17 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 15:33 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-09 16:47 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 17:54 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 0:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408091854.27019.mbuesch@freenet.de \
--to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@lammerts.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.