From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: 'Hirokazu Takahashi' <taka@valinux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Seth,
Rohit" <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Hugetlb demanding paging for -mm tree
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:12:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040809191249.GT11200@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408091819.i79IJ3Y12216@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
William Lee Irwin III wrote on Friday, August 06, 2004 2:08 PM
>> update_mmu_cache() does not appear to check the size of the translation
>> to be established in many architectures. e.g. on arch/ia64/ it does
>> flush_icache_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE) unconditionally, and only
>> sets PG_arch_1 on a single struct page. Similar comments apply to
>> sparc64 and ppc64; I didn't check any others.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:19:04AM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> I suppose this is fixable in update_mmu_cache() where it can check the
> type of pte and do appropriate sizing and other things. ia64 would have
> to check the address instead of looking at the pte.
Yes, it's just a fair amount of document-hunting since there isn't
always easily cut-and-pasteable stuff (e.g. ITAG_MASK for larger page
sizes was omitted from the #ifdefs on sparc64).
As for ia64 checking addresses... ew, can't we just use long format
VHPT? The virtual placement constraints are nasty.
-- wli
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "'Hirokazu Takahashi'" <taka@valinux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Seth,
Rohit" <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Hugetlb demanding paging for -mm tree
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:12:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040809191249.GT11200@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408091819.i79IJ3Y12216@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
William Lee Irwin III wrote on Friday, August 06, 2004 2:08 PM
>> update_mmu_cache() does not appear to check the size of the translation
>> to be established in many architectures. e.g. on arch/ia64/ it does
>> flush_icache_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE) unconditionally, and only
>> sets PG_arch_1 on a single struct page. Similar comments apply to
>> sparc64 and ppc64; I didn't check any others.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:19:04AM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> I suppose this is fixable in update_mmu_cache() where it can check the
> type of pte and do appropriate sizing and other things. ia64 would have
> to check the address instead of looking at the pte.
Yes, it's just a fair amount of document-hunting since there isn't
always easily cut-and-pasteable stuff (e.g. ITAG_MASK for larger page
sizes was omitted from the #ifdefs on sparc64).
As for ia64 checking addresses... ew, can't we just use long format
VHPT? The virtual placement constraints are nasty.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 13:29 Hugetlb demanding paging for -mm tree Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 13:29 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 13:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05 13:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05 13:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 13:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 16:35 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-08-05 16:35 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-08-07 8:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-07 8:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05 13:42 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 13:42 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-05 14:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-05 14:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-05 13:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-05 13:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-06 20:55 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-06 20:55 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-06 21:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 21:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-07 8:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-07 8:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 21:06 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-06 21:06 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-09 18:19 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-09 18:19 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-09 19:12 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-09 19:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-09 18:43 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-09 18:43 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-09 18:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-09 18:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-09 18:54 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-09 18:54 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-08-09 19:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-09 19:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-10 8:52 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-10 8:52 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-10 8:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-10 8:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 0:28 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-11 0:28 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-11 0:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 0:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 6:36 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-11 6:36 ` Seth, Rohit
2004-08-11 6:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 6:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040809191249.GT11200@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.