From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, paulus@samba.org, ak@muc.de,
davem@davemloft.net, wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com,
raybry@sgi.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vrajesh@umich.edu,
hugh@veritas.com
Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:19:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040828151918.578c78f9.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040827223954.7d021aac.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:39:54 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So I think the move to atomic for rss acceptable?
> > >
> > > Short-term, yes. Longer term (within 12 months), no - 50-bit addresses on
> > > power5 will cause it to overflow.
> >
> > I would expect the page size to rise as well. On IA64 we already have
> > 16KB-64KB pages corresponding to 256TB - 1PB. Having to manage a couple of
> > billion pages could be a significant performance impact. Better increase
> > the page size.
>
> I don't know if that's an option on the power architecture.
On x86-64 it isn't an option.
>
> And we need larger atomic types _anyway_ for page->_count. An unprivileged
> app can mmap the same page 4G times and can then munmap it once. Do it on
> purpose and it's a security hole. Due it by accident and it's a crash.
>
> > I still would also like to see atomic64_t. I think there was a patch
> > posted to linux-ia64 a couple of months back introducing atomic64_t but it
> > was rejected since it would not be supportable on other arches.
>
> atomic64_t already appears to be implemented on alpha, ia64, mips, s390 and
> sparc64.
Here's a patch to add it to x86-64:
-Andi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add atomic64_t type to x86-64
diff -u linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h-o linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h
--- linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h-o 2004-03-21 21:11:54.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h 2004-08-28 15:15:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -178,6 +178,166 @@
return c;
}
+/* An 64bit atomic type */
+
+typedef struct { volatile long counter; } atomic64_t;
+
+#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically reads the value of @v.
+ * Doesn't imply a read memory barrier.
+ */
+#define atomic64_read(v) ((v)->counter)
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ * @i: required value
+ *
+ * Atomically sets the value of @v to @i.
+ */
+#define atomic64_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
+ * @i: integer value to add
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically adds @i to @v.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "addq %1,%0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
+ * @i: integer value to subtract
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically subtracts @i from @v.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "subq %1,%0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
+ * @i: integer value to subtract
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically subtracts @i from @v and returns
+ * true if the result is zero, or false for all
+ * other cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_sub_and_test(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "subq %2,%0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically increments @v by 1.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "incq %0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically decrements @v by 1.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "decq %0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically decrements @v by 1 and
+ * returns true if the result is 0, or false for all other
+ * cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "decq %0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c != 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_inc_and_test - increment and test
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically increments @v by 1
+ * and returns true if the result is zero, or false for all
+ * other cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "incq %0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c != 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
+ * @v: pointer to atomic64_t
+ * @i: integer value to add
+ *
+ * Atomically adds @i to @v and returns true
+ * if the result is negative, or false when
+ * result is greater than or equal to zero.
+ */
+static __inline__ long atomic64_add_negative(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "addq %2,%0; sets %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c;
+}
+
/* These are x86-specific, used by some header files */
#define atomic_clear_mask(mask, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__(LOCK "andl %0,%1" \
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, paulus@samba.org, ak@muc.de,
davem@davemloft.net, wli@holomorphy.com, davem@redhat.com,
raybry@sgi.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vrajesh@umich.edu,
hugh@veritas.com
Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:19:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040828151918.578c78f9.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040827223954.7d021aac.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:39:54 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So I think the move to atomic for rss acceptable?
> > >
> > > Short-term, yes. Longer term (within 12 months), no - 50-bit addresses on
> > > power5 will cause it to overflow.
> >
> > I would expect the page size to rise as well. On IA64 we already have
> > 16KB-64KB pages corresponding to 256TB - 1PB. Having to manage a couple of
> > billion pages could be a significant performance impact. Better increase
> > the page size.
>
> I don't know if that's an option on the power architecture.
On x86-64 it isn't an option.
>
> And we need larger atomic types _anyway_ for page->_count. An unprivileged
> app can mmap the same page 4G times and can then munmap it once. Do it on
> purpose and it's a security hole. Due it by accident and it's a crash.
>
> > I still would also like to see atomic64_t. I think there was a patch
> > posted to linux-ia64 a couple of months back introducing atomic64_t but it
> > was rejected since it would not be supportable on other arches.
>
> atomic64_t already appears to be implemented on alpha, ia64, mips, s390 and
> sparc64.
Here's a patch to add it to x86-64:
-Andi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add atomic64_t type to x86-64
diff -u linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h-o linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h
--- linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h-o 2004-03-21 21:11:54.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.8-work/include/asm-x86_64/atomic.h 2004-08-28 15:15:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -178,6 +178,166 @@
return c;
}
+/* An 64bit atomic type */
+
+typedef struct { volatile long counter; } atomic64_t;
+
+#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically reads the value of @v.
+ * Doesn't imply a read memory barrier.
+ */
+#define atomic64_read(v) ((v)->counter)
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ * @i: required value
+ *
+ * Atomically sets the value of @v to @i.
+ */
+#define atomic64_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
+ * @i: integer value to add
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically adds @i to @v.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "addq %1,%0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
+ * @i: integer value to subtract
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically subtracts @i from @v.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "subq %1,%0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
+ * @i: integer value to subtract
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically subtracts @i from @v and returns
+ * true if the result is zero, or false for all
+ * other cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_sub_and_test(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "subq %2,%0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically increments @v by 1.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "incq %0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically decrements @v by 1.
+ */
+static __inline__ void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "decq %0"
+ :"=m" (v->counter)
+ :"m" (v->counter));
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically decrements @v by 1 and
+ * returns true if the result is 0, or false for all other
+ * cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "decq %0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c != 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_inc_and_test - increment and test
+ * @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
+ *
+ * Atomically increments @v by 1
+ * and returns true if the result is zero, or false for all
+ * other cases.
+ */
+static __inline__ int atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "incq %0; sete %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c != 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
+ * @v: pointer to atomic64_t
+ * @i: integer value to add
+ *
+ * Atomically adds @i to @v and returns true
+ * if the result is negative, or false when
+ * result is greater than or equal to zero.
+ */
+static __inline__ long atomic64_add_negative(long i, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ unsigned char c;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ LOCK "addq %2,%0; sets %1"
+ :"=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
+ :"ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ return c;
+}
+
/* These are x86-specific, used by some header files */
#define atomic_clear_mask(mask, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__(LOCK "andl %0,%1" \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 195+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 13:50 page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte Christoph Lameter
2004-08-15 13:50 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-15 20:09 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing David S. Miller
2004-08-15 20:09 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? David S. Miller
2004-08-15 22:58 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Christoph Lameter
2004-08-15 22:58 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-15 23:58 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing David S. Miller
2004-08-15 23:58 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? David S. Miller
2004-08-16 0:11 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 0:11 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 1:56 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing David S. Miller
2004-08-16 1:56 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? David S. Miller
2004-08-16 3:29 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 3:29 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 6:59 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Ray Bryant
2004-08-16 7:00 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Ray Bryant
2004-08-16 15:18 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 15:18 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 16:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-16 16:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-16 14:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-16 14:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-17 15:28 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for 8,32 Christoph Lameter
2004-08-17 15:28 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for 8,32 and 512 cpu SMP Christoph Lameter
2004-08-17 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-17 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-17 15:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-17 15:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-18 17:55 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for 8,32 Hugh Dickins
2004-08-18 17:55 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for 8,32 and 512 cpu SMP Hugh Dickins
2004-08-18 20:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-18 20:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-19 1:19 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for Christoph Lameter
2004-08-19 1:19 ` page fault fastpath patch v2: fix race conditions, stats for 8,32 and 512 cpu SMP Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA3129027B679F@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com>
2004-08-24 4:43 ` page fault scalability patch v3: use cmpxchg, make rss atomic Christoph Lameter
2004-08-24 4:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-08-24 5:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-08-24 5:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-08-24 12:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-24 12:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-24 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-08-24 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA3129027B67A9@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com>
2004-08-26 15:20 ` page fault scalability patch v4: reduce page_table_lock use, atomic Christoph Lameter
2004-08-26 15:20 ` page fault scalability patch v4: reduce page_table_lock use, atomic pmd,pgd handlin Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA3129027B67B4@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com>
2004-08-27 23:20 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-08-27 23:20 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-08-27 23:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-27 23:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-27 23:43 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-08-27 23:43 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-08-28 0:19 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 0:19 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 0:23 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-08-28 0:23 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-08-28 0:36 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 0:36 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 0:40 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-08-28 0:40 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-08-28 1:05 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:05 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:11 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-08-28 1:11 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-08-28 1:17 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:17 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:02 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:02 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 1:39 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 1:39 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 2:08 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Paul Mackerras
2004-08-28 2:08 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Paul Mackerras
2004-08-28 3:32 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 3:32 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 3:42 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 3:42 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 4:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 4:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 5:39 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 5:39 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 5:58 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 5:58 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-08-28 6:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 6:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 6:06 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 6:06 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Andrew Morton
2004-08-30 17:02 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-08-30 17:02 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-08-30 17:05 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-30 17:05 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 13:19 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-08-28 13:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-28 15:48 ` Matt Mackall
2004-08-28 15:48 ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-01 4:13 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-01 4:13 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-02 21:26 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-02 21:26 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-02 21:55 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-09-02 21:55 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-09-01 18:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-01 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-01 19:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 21:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-08-28 21:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-09-01 4:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-01 4:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-01 5:22 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-09-01 5:22 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-09-01 16:43 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-09-01 16:43 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-09-01 23:09 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-01 23:09 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409012140440.23186@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20040901215741.3538bbf4.davem@davemloft.net>
2004-09-02 5:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-02 5:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 15:38 ` page fault scalability patch: V7 (+fallback for atomic page table Christoph Lameter
2004-09-09 15:38 ` page fault scalability patch: V7 (+fallback for atomic page table ops) Christoph Lameter
2004-09-02 16:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-09-02 16:24 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-09-02 20:10 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-09-02 20:10 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-09-02 21:02 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support Christoph Lameter
2004-09-02 21:02 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added Christoph Lameter
2004-09-02 21:07 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 David S. Miller
2004-09-02 21:07 ` page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added David S. Miller
2004-09-18 23:23 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [0/7] Description Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:23 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA312902CD3243@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com>
2004-09-18 23:24 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [1/7] make mm->rss atomic Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:26 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [2/7] avoid page_table_lock in Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:26 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [2/7] avoid page_table_lock in handle_mm_fault Christoph Lameter
2004-09-19 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-19 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-18 23:27 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [3/7] atomic pte operations for Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:27 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [3/7] atomic pte operations for ia64 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:28 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:28 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg on i386 Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <200409191430.37444.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-09-19 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-19 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-20 15:45 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available Christoph Lameter
2004-09-20 15:45 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg on i386 Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <200409202043.00580.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-09-20 20:49 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available Christoph Lameter
2004-09-20 20:49 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg on i386 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-20 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-20 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <200409211841.25507.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-09-21 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-21 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <200409212306.38800.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-09-21 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-21 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-23 7:17 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available Andy Lutomirski
2004-09-23 7:17 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg on i386 Andy Lutomirski
2004-09-23 9:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-23 9:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-27 19:06 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [0/7] overview Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:02 ` page fault scalability patch V10: " Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:03 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [1/7] make rss atomic Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:04 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [2/7] defer/omit taking page_table_lock Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 20:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-15 20:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-18 15:59 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [2/7] defer/omit taking Christoph Lameter
2004-10-18 15:59 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [2/7] defer/omit taking page_table_lock Christoph Lameter
2004-10-19 5:25 ` [revised] page fault scalability patch V10: [2/7] defer/omit taking Christoph Lameter
2004-10-19 5:25 ` [revised] page fault scalability patch V10: [2/7] defer/omit taking page_table_lock Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:05 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [3/7] IA64 atomic pte operations Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:06 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [4/7] cmpxchg for 386 and 486 Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:06 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [5/7] i386 atomic pte operations Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:07 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [6/7] x86_64 " Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:08 ` page fault scalability patch V10: [7/7] s/390 " Christoph Lameter
2004-10-15 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <B6E8046E1E28D34EB815A11AC8CA312902CD3282@mtv-atc-605e--n.corp.sgi.com>
2004-09-27 19:07 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [1/7] make mm->rss atomic Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:08 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [2/7] defer/remove page_table_lock Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:10 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [3/7] atomic pte operatios for ia64 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:10 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [4/7] generally available cmpxchg on i386 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:11 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [5/7] atomic pte operations for i386 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:12 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [6/7] atomic pte operations for x86_64 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-27 19:13 ` page fault scalability patch V9: [7/7] atomic pte operatiosn for s390 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:29 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [5/7] atomic pte operations for Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:29 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [5/7] atomic pte operations for i386 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:30 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [6/7] atomic pte operations for Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:30 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [6/7] atomic pte operations for x86_64 Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:31 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [7/7] atomic pte operations for Christoph Lameter
2004-09-18 23:31 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [7/7] atomic pte operations for s390 Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <200409191435.09445.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-09-20 15:44 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [7/7] atomic pte operations Christoph Lameter
2004-09-20 15:44 ` page fault scalability patch V8: [7/7] atomic pte operations for s390 Christoph Lameter
2004-08-15 22:38 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-15 22:38 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-16 17:28 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Christoph Lameter
2004-08-16 17:28 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Christoph Lameter
2004-08-17 8:01 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-17 8:01 ` page fault fastpath: Increasing SMP scalability by introducing pte locks? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040828151918.578c78f9.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=raybry@sgi.com \
--cc=vrajesh@umich.edu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.