All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Felipe Alfaro Solana <lkml@felipe-alfaro.com>,
	Daniel Schmitt <pnambic@unu.nu>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com,
	"P.O. Gaillard" <pierre-olivier.gaillard@fr.thalesgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R3
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:05:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040904200501.GA15383@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4139D2C1.2020202@cybsft.com>


* K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:

> I am glad that it's reproducible for you as well. How did you trigger
> it? Because it seems to only crash under heavy load for me. The system
> has been up since I rebooted last night after the crash and I haven't
> seen any problems. Same thing goes for up until last night when I
> booted the new patch. Even building the new patch didn't seem to be
> enough to trigger it.

i triggered it via two IO-intense scripts running on a 256 MB RAM
testbox:

  cd /tmp; while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1000000 
  count=500 >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; sync; date; sleep 60; done &

  while true; do du /usr >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; date; done &

usually it triggers within half an hour or so of runtime. With -R4 it
didnt crash yet after ~1 hour of running so i'm quite optimistic that 
this particular bug has been fixed.

i think the key to reproduce was to use KP=0,SP=0,HP=0 - this
concentrates all preemption activity to the places the VP patch adds -
amongst them the one in the do_exit() path that is necessary to trigger
the race.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-04 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-30 19:13 [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-30 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 12:31   ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 - netdev_max_back_log is too small P.O. Gaillard
2004-09-01 13:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 11:24       ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q6 - network is no longer smooth P.O. Gaillard
2004-09-02 11:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 15:26           ` P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-31  8:49 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02  6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02  6:55   ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q8 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02  7:04     ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02  7:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02  7:31         ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02  7:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  1:10             ` Rusty Russell
2004-09-03  1:10               ` Rusty Russell
2004-09-02 23:25         ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 23:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 23:32             ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02  7:17       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02  8:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 11:10     ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q9 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 12:14       ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 13:16       ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 13:23         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 14:38           ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 21:57       ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 22:06         ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 22:14           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 22:15             ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  0:24             ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  3:17               ` Eric St-Laurent
2004-09-03  6:26                 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  6:36                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  6:49                     ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  7:01                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  7:05                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  7:40                         ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  7:50                           ` Free Ekanayaka
2004-09-03  8:05                             ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  9:05                               ` Free Ekanayaka
2004-09-03  9:25                               ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R1 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  9:50                                 ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 10:29                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 10:43                                     ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 11:33                                 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 11:49                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 12:05                                     ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 16:14                                     ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 17:36                                       ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 11:36                                 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R2 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03  8:09                           ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03  8:13                             ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03  8:21                               ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 12:52                               ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 18:09                         ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 11:04         ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 17:02         ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 20:40           ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 17:10         ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 18:17           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 18:36             ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 19:30             ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R3 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 19:49               ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04  3:39               ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04  3:43               ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04  6:41                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-04 12:28                   ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04  8:57                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-04 10:16                   ` Lee Revell
2004-09-04 14:35                   ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 20:05                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-09-03 18:39           ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 18:41             ` K.R. Foley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040904200501.GA15383@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@felipe-alfaro.com \
    --cc=pierre-olivier.gaillard@fr.thalesgroup.com \
    --cc=pnambic@unu.nu \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.