All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:12:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908111204.I1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908172503.384144933@zion.localdomain>; from blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it on Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:25:02PM +0200

* blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it (blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it) wrote:
> 
> Trivial: don't lock the queue spinlock when called from the request function.
> Since the faulty function must use spinlock in another case, double-case it.
> And since we will never use both functions together, let no object code be
> shared between them.

Why not add a helper which locks around the core function.  Then either
call helper or core function directly depending on locking needs?

Smth. along the lines of below.

===== arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 1.36 vs edited =====
--- 1.36/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c	2004-08-24 02:08:18 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c	2004-09-08 11:06:54 -07:00
@@ -396,14 +396,20 @@
  */
 int intr_count = 0;
 
-static void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+static inline void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+{
+ 	spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
+	__ubd_finish(req, error);
+	spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
+}
+
+/* call ubd_finish if you need to serialize */
+static void __ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
 {
 	int nsect;
 
 	if(error){
- 		spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
 		end_request(req, 0);
- 		spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 	nsect = req->current_nr_sectors;
@@ -412,9 +418,7 @@
 	req->errors = 0;
 	req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
 	req->current_nr_sectors = 0;
-	spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
 	end_request(req, 1);
-	spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
 }
 
 static void ubd_handler(void)
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:12:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908111204.I1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908172503.384144933@zion.localdomain>; from blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it on Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:25:02PM +0200

* blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it (blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it) wrote:
> 
> Trivial: don't lock the queue spinlock when called from the request function.
> Since the faulty function must use spinlock in another case, double-case it.
> And since we will never use both functions together, let no object code be
> shared between them.

Why not add a helper which locks around the core function.  Then either
call helper or core function directly depending on locking needs?

Smth. along the lines of below.

===== arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 1.36 vs edited =====
--- 1.36/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c	2004-08-24 02:08:18 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c	2004-09-08 11:06:54 -07:00
@@ -396,14 +396,20 @@
  */
 int intr_count = 0;
 
-static void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+static inline void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+{
+ 	spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
+	__ubd_finish(req, error);
+	spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
+}
+
+/* call ubd_finish if you need to serialize */
+static void __ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
 {
 	int nsect;
 
 	if(error){
- 		spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
 		end_request(req, 0);
- 		spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 	nsect = req->current_nr_sectors;
@@ -412,9 +418,7 @@
 	req->errors = 0;
 	req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
 	req->current_nr_sectors = 0;
-	spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
 	end_request(req, 1);
-	spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
 }
 
 static void ubd_handler(void)
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-08 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-08 17:25 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-08 17:25 ` blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-08 18:12 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-09-08 18:12   ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:02   ` [uml-devel] " BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:02     ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:32     ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:32       ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:44       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:44         ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 19:29         ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 19:29           ` Chris Wright
2004-09-10 19:01           ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-10 19:01             ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09  7:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-09  7:35   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040908111204.I1973@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.