From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org,
jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:29:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909122906.N1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409092044.54512.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>; from blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it on Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:44:54PM +0200
* BlaisorBlade (blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it) wrote:
> Yes, thanks a lot for your help.
Rename ubd_finish() to __ubd_finsh() and remove ubd_io_lock from it.
Add wrapper, ubd_finish(), which grabs lock before calling __ubd_finish().
Update do_ubd_request to use the lock free __ubd_finish() to avoid
deadlock. Also, apparently prepare_request is called with ubd_io_lock
held, so remove locks there.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
===== arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 1.38 vs edited =====
--- 1.38/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-09-07 23:33:13 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-09-09 12:18:01 -07:00
@@ -396,14 +396,20 @@
*/
int intr_count = 0;
-static void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+static inline void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+{
+ spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
+ __ubd_finish(req, error);
+ spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
+}
+
+/* call ubd_finish if you need to serialize */
+static void __ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
{
int nsect;
if(error){
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 0);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
return;
}
nsect = req->current_nr_sectors;
@@ -412,11 +418,10 @@
req->errors = 0;
req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
req->current_nr_sectors = 0;
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 1);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
}
+/* Called without ubd_io_lock held */
static void ubd_handler(void)
{
struct io_thread_req req;
@@ -965,6 +970,7 @@
return(0);
}
+/* Called with ubd_io_lock held */
static int prepare_request(struct request *req, struct io_thread_req *io_req)
{
struct gendisk *disk = req->rq_disk;
@@ -977,9 +983,7 @@
if((rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && !dev->openflags.w){
printk("Write attempted on readonly ubd device %s\n",
disk->disk_name);
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 0);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
return(1);
}
@@ -1029,6 +1033,7 @@
return(0);
}
+/* Called with ubd_io_lock held */
static void do_ubd_request(request_queue_t *q)
{
struct io_thread_req io_req;
@@ -1040,7 +1045,7 @@
err = prepare_request(req, &io_req);
if(!err){
do_io(&io_req);
- ubd_finish(req, io_req.error);
+ __ubd_finish(req, io_req.error);
}
}
}
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org,
jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:29:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909122906.N1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409092044.54512.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>; from blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it on Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:44:54PM +0200
* BlaisorBlade (blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it) wrote:
> Yes, thanks a lot for your help.
Rename ubd_finish() to __ubd_finsh() and remove ubd_io_lock from it.
Add wrapper, ubd_finish(), which grabs lock before calling __ubd_finish().
Update do_ubd_request to use the lock free __ubd_finish() to avoid
deadlock. Also, apparently prepare_request is called with ubd_io_lock
held, so remove locks there.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
===== arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 1.38 vs edited =====
--- 1.38/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-09-07 23:33:13 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c 2004-09-09 12:18:01 -07:00
@@ -396,14 +396,20 @@
*/
int intr_count = 0;
-static void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+static inline void ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
+{
+ spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
+ __ubd_finish(req, error);
+ spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
+}
+
+/* call ubd_finish if you need to serialize */
+static void __ubd_finish(struct request *req, int error)
{
int nsect;
if(error){
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 0);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
return;
}
nsect = req->current_nr_sectors;
@@ -412,11 +418,10 @@
req->errors = 0;
req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
req->current_nr_sectors = 0;
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 1);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
}
+/* Called without ubd_io_lock held */
static void ubd_handler(void)
{
struct io_thread_req req;
@@ -965,6 +970,7 @@
return(0);
}
+/* Called with ubd_io_lock held */
static int prepare_request(struct request *req, struct io_thread_req *io_req)
{
struct gendisk *disk = req->rq_disk;
@@ -977,9 +983,7 @@
if((rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && !dev->openflags.w){
printk("Write attempted on readonly ubd device %s\n",
disk->disk_name);
- spin_lock(&ubd_io_lock);
end_request(req, 0);
- spin_unlock(&ubd_io_lock);
return(1);
}
@@ -1029,6 +1033,7 @@
return(0);
}
+/* Called with ubd_io_lock held */
static void do_ubd_request(request_queue_t *q)
{
struct io_thread_req io_req;
@@ -1040,7 +1045,7 @@
err = prepare_request(req, &io_req);
if(!err){
do_io(&io_req);
- ubd_finish(req, io_req.error);
+ __ubd_finish(req, io_req.error);
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-09 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 17:25 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-08 17:25 ` blaisorblade_spam
2004-09-08 18:12 ` [uml-devel] " Chris Wright
2004-09-08 18:12 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:02 ` [uml-devel] " BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:02 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:32 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:32 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:44 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 18:44 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 19:29 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-09-09 19:29 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-10 19:01 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-10 19:01 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 7:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-09 7:35 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040909122906.N1973@build.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.