* [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/cs89x0: replace schedule_timeout()
@ 2004-07-26 23:53 Nishanth Aravamudan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2004-07-26 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]
I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the
task delays for the desired time.
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/net/cs89x0.c 2004-06-16 05:19:52.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/net/cs89x0.c 2004-07-12 18:59:24.000000000 +0000
@@ -889,8 +889,7 @@ void __init reset_chip(struct net_devic
writereg(dev, PP_SelfCTL, readreg(dev, PP_SelfCTL) | POWER_ON_RESET);
/* wait 30 ms */
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(30*HZ/1000);
+ msleep(30);
if (lp->chip_type != CS8900) {
/* Hardware problem requires PNP registers to be reconfigured after a reset */
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/cs89x0: replace schedule_timeout()
@ 2004-09-21 20:45 maximilian attems
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2004-09-21 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1335 bytes --]
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
> many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
>
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> schedule_timeout(some_time);
>
> with
>
> msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
>
> msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
> this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
> not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Nish
>
>
>
> Applys-to: 2.6.7
>
> Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the
> task delays for the desired time.
>
>
> --- linux-vanilla/drivers/net/cs89x0.c 2004-06-16 05:19:52.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-dev/drivers/net/cs89x0.c 2004-07-12 18:59:24.000000000 +0000
> @@ -889,8 +889,7 @@ void __init reset_chip(struct net_devic
> writereg(dev, PP_SelfCTL, readreg(dev, PP_SelfCTL) | POWER_ON_RESET);
>
> /* wait 30 ms */
> - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> - schedule_timeout(30*HZ/1000);
> + msleep(30);
>
> if (lp->chip_type != CS8900) {
> /* Hardware problem requires PNP registers to be reconfigured after a reset */
this one doesn't compile:
drivers/net/cs89x0.c:912: warning: implicit declaration of function `msleep'
fixed for next kjt.
a++ maks
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-21 20:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-21 20:45 [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] net/cs89x0: replace schedule_timeout() maximilian attems
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 23:53 Nishanth Aravamudan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.