From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Gibbons, Terry" <Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com>
Cc: "'arjanv@redhat.com'" <arjanv@redhat.com>,
'James Bottomley' <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
"Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>,
"Stephens, Larry" <larry.stephens@lsil.com>,
"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:30:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006143002.GA27262@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC3CE0375D29D51199A400508B66CA6C0862AEFE@exc-snake.co.lsil.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:23:23AM -0600, Gibbons, Terry wrote:
> I stand corrected. Our customers will force driver patches through Red Hat
> and SuSE. They buy these products and keep Linux distributors in business.
> Do you expect our customers to take huge hits to their bottom line because
> DV will no longer execute properly on LSI devices?
You're totally missing the point. No one wants to remove DV
functionality. We want a single implementation of the DV mechanism in
the SPI transport class instead of various buggy copies in individual
drivers.
No may I kindly suggest that you stop trolling on this list and let your
staff handle this issue. I'm pretty sure we can work out a solution
that suits everyone with Eric if we get the nonsensical managment issues
out of the loop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 14:23 [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-10-06 15:47 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 14:58 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-06 14:46 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 14:00 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-06 14:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 22:38 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-05 23:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-05 23:37 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-06 0:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-04 21:33 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-04 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-06 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 8:13 Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 13:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-02 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-21 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006143002.GA27262@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com \
--cc=Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=larry.stephens@lsil.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.