From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: "Gibbons, Terry" <Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"'arjanv@redhat.com'" <arjanv@redhat.com>,
'James Bottomley' <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
"Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>,
"Stephens, Larry" <larry.stephens@lsil.com>,
"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:58:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006145821.GD16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC3CE0375D29D51199A400508B66CA6C0862AEFF@exc-snake.co.lsil.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:46:11AM -0600, Gibbons, Terry wrote:
> I was copied because the very people that will resolve the issue, namely
> Eric and Larry, included me as to bring support to their position that they
> have a BIG problem and solutions aren't being mutually agreed upon.
>
> Therefore, I'm the one chosen to take the unpopular stance of challenging
> the status quo and asking for solutions as opposed to pushback on every
> stance LSI has put forth.
All I said was:
> Of course, at some point, Fusion should be switched over to use the
> scsi_transport_spi domain validation code ... not urgent, just an
> item for the long-term todo list.
I see the remainder of the thread as being pushback from _LSI_ on the
direction that the rest of the SCSI people have decided to go.
If you're not part of the solution ...
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 14:46 [PATCH] fusion: streamline ->queuecommand Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:58 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 14:58 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-06 14:23 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-06 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-06 14:00 Gibbons, Terry
2004-10-06 14:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-06 14:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 22:38 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-05 23:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-05 23:37 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-06 0:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-04 21:33 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-04 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-06 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 8:13 Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-02 13:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-02 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-21 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006145821.GD16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com \
--cc=Terry.Gibbons@lsil.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=larry.stephens@lsil.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.