From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>, Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>,
Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 20:48:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006204832.GB26459@cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410061327.28572.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:27:28PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Though now what's there seems awfully redundant, wouldn't you say?
Yes - but we are using code which *requires* the arch define raw_pci_ops.
See drivers/acpi/osl.c:acpi_os_initialize()
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI
if (!raw_pci_ops) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Access to PCI configuration space unavailable\n");
return AE_NULL_ENTRY;
}
#endif
> Just
> allowing direct access to pci_root_ops is a much simpler approach and gets
> rid of a bunch of extra, unneeded code (i.e. closer to Pat's original
> version).
Agreed. I'm not real clear on why drivers/acpi didn't do that.
But apperently ACPI supports many methods to PCI or PCI-Like (can you
guess I'm not clear on this?) config space. raw_pci_ops supports
multiple methods in i386. ia64 only happens to use one so far.
It seems right for SN2 to use this mechanism if it needs a different
method.
Willy tried to explain this to me yesterday and I thought I understood
most of it...apperently that was a transient moment of clarity. :^/
...
> > Can you quote the bit of the patch which implements "if the bus does not
> > exist" check?
> > I can't find it.
>
> In the current code it's:
>
> for (i = 0; i < PCI_BUSES_TO_SCAN; i++)
> if (pci_bus_to_vertex(i))
> pci_scan_bus(i, &sn_pci_ops, controller);
>
> which causes the next loop to only fixup existing busses. But I don't see it
> in the new code.
Ok. I'm glad it's not just me 'cuz I'm having a bad day.
thanks,
grant
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>, Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>,
Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:48:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006204832.GB26459@cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410061327.28572.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:27:28PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Though now what's there seems awfully redundant, wouldn't you say?
Yes - but we are using code which *requires* the arch define raw_pci_ops.
See drivers/acpi/osl.c:acpi_os_initialize()
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI
if (!raw_pci_ops) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Access to PCI configuration space unavailable\n");
return AE_NULL_ENTRY;
}
#endif
> Just
> allowing direct access to pci_root_ops is a much simpler approach and gets
> rid of a bunch of extra, unneeded code (i.e. closer to Pat's original
> version).
Agreed. I'm not real clear on why drivers/acpi didn't do that.
But apperently ACPI supports many methods to PCI or PCI-Like (can you
guess I'm not clear on this?) config space. raw_pci_ops supports
multiple methods in i386. ia64 only happens to use one so far.
It seems right for SN2 to use this mechanism if it needs a different
method.
Willy tried to explain this to me yesterday and I thought I understood
most of it...apperently that was a transient moment of clarity. :^/
...
> > Can you quote the bit of the patch which implements "if the bus does not
> > exist" check?
> > I can't find it.
>
> In the current code it's:
>
> for (i = 0; i < PCI_BUSES_TO_SCAN; i++)
> if (pci_bus_to_vertex(i))
> pci_scan_bus(i, &sn_pci_ops, controller);
>
> which causes the next loop to only fixup existing busses. But I don't see it
> in the new code.
Ok. I'm glad it's not just me 'cuz I'm having a bad day.
thanks,
grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-04 21:57 [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Pat Gefre
2004-10-04 21:57 ` Pat Gefre
2004-10-05 5:13 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 5:13 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 19:16 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:16 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 20:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 20:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <4169A508.84FB19C7@sgi.com>
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-07 17:06 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:06 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006204832.GB26459@cup.hp.com \
--to=iod00d@hp.com \
--cc=cngam@sgi.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=pfg@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.