All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: news about IDE PIO HIGHMEM bug
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:48:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041027184836.GA12934@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417FEA09.6080502@pobox.com>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I think this is the wrong level of interface exposed.  Just add two hepler
>> kmap_atomic_sg/kunmap_atomic_sg that gurantee to map/unmap a sg list entry,
>> even if it's bigger than a page.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:33:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Why bother mapping anything larger than a page, when none of the users 
> need it?
> P.S. In your scheme you would need four helpers; you forgot kmap_sg() 
> and kunmap_sg().

This is all a non-issue. The page structure just represents little more
than a physical address to the block layer in the context of merging,
so the pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn(...) + ...) bits calculate this properly.
There is just nothing interesting going on here. Generate the page
structure for the piece of the segment, kmap_atomic() it, and it's done.


-- wli

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: news about IDE PIO HIGHMEM bug
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:48:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041027184836.GA12934@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417FEA09.6080502@pobox.com>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I think this is the wrong level of interface exposed.  Just add two hepler
>> kmap_atomic_sg/kunmap_atomic_sg that gurantee to map/unmap a sg list entry,
>> even if it's bigger than a page.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:33:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Why bother mapping anything larger than a page, when none of the users 
> need it?
> P.S. In your scheme you would need four helpers; you forgot kmap_sg() 
> and kunmap_sg().

This is all a non-issue. The page structure just represents little more
than a physical address to the block layer in the context of merging,
so the pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn(...) + ...) bits calculate this properly.
There is just nothing interesting going on here. Generate the page
structure for the piece of the segment, kmap_atomic() it, and it's done.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-27 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <58cb370e041027074676750027@mail.gmail.com>
2004-10-27 15:14 ` news about IDE PIO HIGHMEM bug (was: Re: 2.6.9-mm1) Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 15:14   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 15:52   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 15:52     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 15:59     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 15:59       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 17:36       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 17:36         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 16:01     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 16:01       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-27 16:35       ` [PATCH] " Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 21:29         ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-27 21:29           ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-27 21:31           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 21:31             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 21:34           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-27 21:34             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-27 18:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-27 18:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-27 18:33         ` news about IDE PIO HIGHMEM bug Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 18:33           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 18:48           ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-10-27 18:48             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-28  0:18           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-28  0:18             ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041027184836.GA12934@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.