All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	ak@muc.de, suparna@in.ibm.com,
	dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] kprobes: Minor i386 changes required for porting kprobes to x86_64
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 02:29:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041030205959.GA1266@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028113444.GA5812@in.ibm.com>



-Kprobes structure has been modified to support copying of original
instruction as required by the architecture. On x86_64 normal pages we get
from kmalloc or vmalloc are not executable. Single-stepping an instruction 
on such a page yields an oops. So instead of storing the instruction copies 
in their respective kprobe objects, we allocate a page, map it executable, 
and store all the instruction copies there and store the pointer of the copied
instruction in the specific kprobes object.
-jprobe_return_end is moved into inline assembly to avoid compiler optimization.
-arch_prepare_kprobe() now returns an integer,since arch_prepare_kprobe()
might fail on other architectures.
-added arch_remove_kprobe() routine, since other architectures requires it.

Signed-off-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
---


---

 linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c |   32 ++++++++++--------
 linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/include/asm-i386/kprobes.h |    7 +++
 linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/include/linux/kprobes.h    |    5 +-
 linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/kernel/kprobes.c           |    6 ++-
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-arch-i386-changes arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
--- linux-2.6.9-final/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-arch-i386-changes	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
 static long *jprobe_saved_esp;
 /* copy of the kernel stack at the probe fire time */
 static kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE];
+void jprobe_return_end(void);
 
 /*
  * returns non-zero if opcode modifies the interrupt flag.
@@ -58,9 +59,14 @@ static inline int is_IF_modifier(kprobe_
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
-	memcpy(p->insn, p->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
 }
 
 static inline void disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -73,7 +79,7 @@ static inline void prepare_singlestep(st
 {
 	regs->eflags |= TF_MASK;
 	regs->eflags &= ~IF_MASK;
-	regs->eip = (unsigned long)&p->insn;
+	regs->eip = (unsigned long)&p->ainsn.insn;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -153,7 +159,7 @@ static inline int kprobe_handler(struct 
  * instruction.  To avoid the SMP problems that can occur when we
  * temporarily put back the original opcode to single-step, we
  * single-stepped a copy of the instruction.  The address of this
- * copy is p->insn.
+ * copy is p->ainsn.insn.
  *
  * This function prepares to return from the post-single-step
  * interrupt.  We have to fix up the stack as follows:
@@ -173,10 +179,10 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kpro
 {
 	unsigned long *tos = (unsigned long *)&regs->esp;
 	unsigned long next_eip = 0;
-	unsigned long copy_eip = (unsigned long)&p->insn;
+	unsigned long copy_eip = (unsigned long)&p->ainsn.insn;
 	unsigned long orig_eip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
 
-	switch (p->insn[0]) {
+	switch (p->ainsn.insn[0]) {
 	case 0x9c:		/* pushfl */
 		*tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
 		*tos |= kprobe_old_eflags;
@@ -185,13 +191,13 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kpro
 		*tos = orig_eip + (*tos - copy_eip);
 		break;
 	case 0xff:
-		if ((p->insn[1] & 0x30) == 0x10) {
+		if ((p->ainsn.insn[1] & 0x30) == 0x10) {
 			/* call absolute, indirect */
 			/* Fix return addr; eip is correct. */
 			next_eip = regs->eip;
 			*tos = orig_eip + (*tos - copy_eip);
-		} else if (((p->insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x20) ||	/* jmp near, absolute indirect */
-			   ((p->insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x21)) {	/* jmp far, absolute indirect */
+		} else if (((p->ainsn.insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x20) ||	/* jmp near, absolute indirect */
+			   ((p->ainsn.insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x21)) {	/* jmp far, absolute indirect */
 			/* eip is correct. */
 			next_eip = regs->eip;
 		}
@@ -315,12 +321,12 @@ void jprobe_return(void)
 {
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 	asm volatile ("       xchgl   %%ebx,%%esp     \n"
-		      "       int3			\n"::"b"
+		      "       int3			\n"
+		      "       .globl jprobe_return_end	\n"
+		      "       jprobe_return_end:	\n"
+		      "       nop			\n"::"b"
 		      (jprobe_saved_esp):"memory");
 }
-void jprobe_return_end(void)
-{
-};
 
 int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
diff -puN include/asm-i386/kprobes.h~kprobes-arch-i386-changes include/asm-i386/kprobes.h
--- linux-2.6.9-final/include/asm-i386/kprobes.h~kprobes-arch-i386-changes	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/include/asm-i386/kprobes.h	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -38,6 +38,13 @@ typedef u8 kprobe_opcode_t;
 	? (MAX_STACK_SIZE) \
 	: (((unsigned long)current_thread_info()) + THREAD_SIZE - (ADDR)))
 
+/* Architecture specific copy of original instruction*/
+struct arch_specific_insn {
+	/* copy of the original instruction */
+	kprobe_opcode_t insn[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+};
+
+
 /* trap3/1 are intr gates for kprobes.  So, restore the status of IF,
  * if necessary, before executing the original int3/1 (trap) handler.
  */
diff -puN include/linux/kprobes.h~kprobes-arch-i386-changes include/linux/kprobes.h
--- linux-2.6.9-final/include/linux/kprobes.h~kprobes-arch-i386-changes	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/include/linux/kprobes.h	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct kprobe {
 	kprobe_opcode_t opcode;
 
 	/* copy of the original instruction */
-	kprobe_opcode_t insn[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+	struct arch_specific_insn ainsn;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static inline int kprobe_running(void)
 	return kprobe_cpu == smp_processor_id();
 }
 
-extern void arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
+extern int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
+extern void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
 extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 /* Get the kprobe at this addr (if any).  Must have called lock_kprobes */
diff -puN kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-arch-i386-changes kernel/kprobes.c
--- linux-2.6.9-final/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-arch-i386-changes	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.9-final-prasanna/kernel/kprobes.c	2004-10-31 02:10:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -84,10 +84,13 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		ret = -EEXIST;
 		goto out;
 	}
+
+	if ((ret = arch_prepare_kprobe(p)) != 0) {
+		goto out;
+	}
 	hlist_add_head(&p->hlist,
 		       &kprobe_table[hash_ptr(p->addr, KPROBE_HASH_BITS)]);
 
-	arch_prepare_kprobe(p);
 	p->opcode = *p->addr;
 	*p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION;
 	flush_icache_range((unsigned long) p->addr,
@@ -101,6 +104,7 @@ void unregister_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&kprobe_lock, flags);
+	arch_remove_kprobe(p);
 	*p->addr = p->opcode;
 	hlist_del(&p->hlist);
 	flush_icache_range((unsigned long) p->addr,

_
-- 

Thanks & Regards
Prasanna S Panchamukhi
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Ph: 91-80-25044636
<prasanna@in.ibm.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-30  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-28 11:32 [0/3] PATCH Kprobes for x86_64- 2.6.9-final Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:34 ` [1/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:35   ` [2/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:38     ` [3/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 21:06       ` [patch 3/3] kprobes : Minor changes for sparc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 21:03     ` [patch 2/3] kprobes : kprobes ported to x86_64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 20:59   ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi [this message]
2004-10-28 11:37 ` [0/3] PATCH Kprobes for x86_64- 2.6.9-final Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 15:53   ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 23:42     ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 18:15   ` David S. Miller
2004-10-28 23:41     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041030205959.GA1266@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.