Re: Updated SELinux Release

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>]

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:06:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15 +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 
> >  default: no.
> 
> Why not on by default, 

 i would agree with stephen that it should be compiled in,
 default options "selinux=no".

 that gives people the choice, without affecting performance.

> with a targeted policy, for everyone?  

 debianites have yet to be convinced of the benefits of
 _anything_ to do with selinux [irrespective of whether they
 are actually _aware_ of its benefits]

 i specifically recall seeing a message from 2002 "the more i learn
 about selinux, i like it less and less".

 that having been said, i believe, like i think you do, that a
 targetted policy for debian _would_ make selinux much easier
 to accept.

 l.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.