From: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
To: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
ACPI Developers
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: remove unused exported functions
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:38:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041110233833.GD1099@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099707007.13834.1969.camel@d845pe>
Hi!
> > The patch below completely removes 7 functions that were
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but had exactly zero users in the kernel and makes
> > another one that was previously EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed static.
> >
> > It also removes another unused global function to completely remove
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/hwtimer.c which contained no function used
> > anywhere in the kernel.
> >
> > Please comment on whether this patch is correct or whether in-kernel
> > users of these functions are pending.
> >
> >
> > diffstat output:
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_ksyms.c | 8 -
> > drivers/acpi/events/evxfevnt.c | 191 -----------------------------
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/Makefile | 2
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/hwtimer.c | 200
> > -------------------------------
> > drivers/acpi/resources/rsxface.c | 52 --------
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6
> > drivers/acpi/utilities/utxface.c | 89 -------------
> > include/acpi/achware.h | 17 --
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1
> > include/acpi/acpixf.h | 24 ---
> > 10 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 584 deletions(-)
>
> No, I can't apply this one as-is.
> Some of these routines are not called now
> simply because Linux/ACPI is evolving and we don't
> yet take advantage of some of the things supported
> by ACPICA core we use.
I believe right thing to do is remove them now, and re-add them later
(if they are ever needed).
Single line patch somewhere which happens to pull whole evxfevnt.c
would be pretty "expensive", but would not certainly look so...
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
ACPI Developers <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: remove unused exported functions
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:38:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041110233833.GD1099@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099707007.13834.1969.camel@d845pe>
Hi!
> > The patch below completely removes 7 functions that were
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed but had exactly zero users in the kernel and makes
> > another one that was previously EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed static.
> >
> > It also removes another unused global function to completely remove
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/hwtimer.c which contained no function used
> > anywhere in the kernel.
> >
> > Please comment on whether this patch is correct or whether in-kernel
> > users of these functions are pending.
> >
> >
> > diffstat output:
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_ksyms.c | 8 -
> > drivers/acpi/events/evxfevnt.c | 191 -----------------------------
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/Makefile | 2
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/hwtimer.c | 200
> > -------------------------------
> > drivers/acpi/resources/rsxface.c | 52 --------
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6
> > drivers/acpi/utilities/utxface.c | 89 -------------
> > include/acpi/achware.h | 17 --
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1
> > include/acpi/acpixf.h | 24 ---
> > 10 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 584 deletions(-)
>
> No, I can't apply this one as-is.
> Some of these routines are not called now
> simply because Linux/ACPI is evolving and we don't
> yet take advantage of some of the things supported
> by ACPICA core we use.
I believe right thing to do is remove them now, and re-add them later
(if they are ever needed).
Single line patch somewhere which happens to pull whole evxfevnt.c
would be pretty "expensive", but would not certainly look so...
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-10 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-05 21:50 [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: remove unused exported functions Adrian Bunk
2004-11-06 2:10 ` Len Brown
2004-11-06 11:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-06 15:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2004-11-06 21:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-06 21:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <418D403E.30608-KCZ47A4bww4P48s/oLjRZg@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-08 17:01 ` Len Brown
2004-11-08 17:01 ` Len Brown
2004-11-09 1:40 ` [2.6 patch] kill acpi_ksyms.c Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <20041109014021.GB15077-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-12 4:56 ` Len Brown
2004-11-12 4:56 ` Len Brown
2004-11-10 1:21 ` [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: #ifdef unused functions away Adrian Bunk
2004-11-10 1:21 ` Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <20041110012134.GB4089-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 15:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-11 15:17 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20041111151727.GB1108-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-11 15:36 ` [ACPI] " Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <20041111153650.GD8417-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 15:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-11 15:40 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20041111154017.GC1108-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 15:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-11 15:46 ` [ACPI] " Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <20041111154656.GE8417-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 16:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-11 16:08 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20041111160842.GD1108-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-11 19:17 ` Len Brown
2004-11-11 19:17 ` [ACPI] " Len Brown
2004-11-10 23:38 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-11-10 23:38 ` [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: remove unused exported functions Pavel Machek
2004-11-06 20:39 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-06 21:26 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041110233833.GD1099@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel-+zi9xunit7i@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bunk-HeJ8Db2Gnd6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.