From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
Gunther Persoons <gunther_persoons@spymac.com>,
emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman <shrybman@aei.ca>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@codito.com>,
Stefan Schweizer <sschweizer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041116224736.0c647e42@mango.fruits.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419A745C.4040101@cybsft.com>
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:42:52 -0600
"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
> Just a thought. What priority are you running rtc_wakup at? If you are
> doing something like:
>
> schp.sched_priority = sched_get_priority_max(SCHED_FIFO); // which
> equates to a priority of 99
>
> Then you it is actually running at a higher priority than the rtc, and
> it won't work very well. I tend to run rtc (IRQ 8) at 99 and the
> programs accessing it at 98 which seems to work reasonably well.
yah, the default for rtc_wakeup is 91 for the read() thread and 90 for the
reporting thread. So rtc's prio is above that.
flo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-16 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-16 16:09 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 18:41 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 19:51 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 21:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 21:32 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 22:04 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 23:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 22:55 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 23:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 0:06 ` john cooper
2004-11-17 11:23 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 12:14 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 13:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 12:59 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 13:35 ` Paul Ma
2004-11-17 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 13:00 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 6:19 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-11 ???
2004-11-16 21:42 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 21:47 ` Florian Schmidt [this message]
2004-11-16 22:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 21:33 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 21:40 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 23:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 7:59 ` BUG with 0.7.27-11, with KGDB Amit Shah
2004-11-17 8:26 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-17 9:19 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-17 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-17 14:01 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 16:15 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 17:39 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-27 0:15 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.3 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:58 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-V0.7.1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-06 15:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.18 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 9:16 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.19 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 16:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.21 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-09 16:05 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 14:44 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-0 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 21:51 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 12:54 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-0 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 13:09 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 13:40 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 14:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:08 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:52 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-11-16 18:43 ` Marcos D. Marado Torres
2004-11-16 18:51 ` Lee Revell
2004-11-16 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 0:36 ` Bill Huey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041116224736.0c647e42@mango.fruits.de \
--to=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=amit.shah@codito.com \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=emann@mrv.com \
--cc=gunther_persoons@spymac.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=shrybman@aei.ca \
--cc=sschweizer@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.