From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
Gunther Persoons <gunther_persoons@spymac.com>,
emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman <shrybman@aei.ca>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@codito.com>,
Stefan Schweizer <sschweizer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:04:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041116230443.452497b9@mango.fruits.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041116224257.GB27550@elte.hu>
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:42:57 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> this is either a false positive, or we missed a preemption. To see which
> one, could you apply the attached patch and try to reproduce this long
> trace? The new trace will tell us whether need_resched is set during
> that ~1 msec window.
hmm, the output doens't look so much different (or am i just blind?). maybe
i need to do make clean before building with this patch applied?
flo
preemption latency trace v1.0.7 on 2.6.10-rc2-mm1-RT-V0.7.27-10
-------------------------------------------------------
latency: 992 us, entries: 22 (22) | [VP:0 KP:1 SP:1 HP:1 #CPUS:1]
-----------------
| task: IRQ 0/2, uid:0 nice:0 policy:1 rt_prio:49
-----------------
=> started at: try_to_wake_up+0x51/0x170 <c010f3a1>
=> ended at: finish_task_switch+0x51/0xb0 <c010f911>
=======>
5 80010004 0.000ms (+0.000ms): trace_start_sched_wakeup (try_to_wake_up)
5 88010003 0.000ms (+0.000ms): (50) ((98))
5 88010003 0.000ms (+0.000ms): (2) ((5))
5 88010003 0.000ms (+0.000ms): try_to_wake_up (wake_up_process)
5 88010003 0.000ms (+0.000ms): (0) ((1))
5 88010002 0.000ms (+0.000ms): preempt_schedule (try_to_wake_up)
5 88010002 0.000ms (+0.000ms): wake_up_process (redirect_hardirq)
5 88010001 0.000ms (+0.000ms): preempt_schedule (__do_IRQ)
5 88010001 0.000ms (+0.000ms): irq_exit (do_IRQ)
5 88000002 0.000ms (+0.000ms): do_softirq (irq_exit)
5 88000002 0.001ms (+0.990ms): __do_softirq (do_softirq)
5 08000000 0.991ms (+0.000ms): preempt_schedule (_mmx_memcpy)
5 98000000 0.991ms (+0.000ms): __schedule (preempt_schedule)
5 98000000 0.991ms (+0.000ms): profile_hit (__schedule)
5 98000001 0.991ms (+0.000ms): sched_clock (__schedule)
2 80000002 0.991ms (+0.000ms): __switch_to (__schedule)
2 80000002 0.991ms (+0.000ms): (5) ((2))
2 80000002 0.992ms (+0.000ms): (98) ((50))
2 80000002 0.992ms (+0.000ms): finish_task_switch (__schedule)
2 80000001 0.992ms (+0.000ms): trace_stop_sched_switched (finish_task_switch)
2 80000001 0.992ms (+0.001ms): (2) ((50))
2 80000001 0.993ms (+0.000ms): trace_stop_sched_switched (finish_task_switch)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-16 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-16 16:09 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 18:41 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 19:51 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 21:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 21:32 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 22:04 ` Florian Schmidt [this message]
2004-11-16 23:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 22:55 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 23:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 0:06 ` john cooper
2004-11-17 11:23 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 12:14 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 13:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 12:59 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 13:35 ` Paul Ma
2004-11-17 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 13:00 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-17 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 6:19 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-11 ???
2004-11-16 21:42 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 K.R. Foley
2004-11-16 21:47 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 22:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 21:33 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 21:40 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 23:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 7:59 ` BUG with 0.7.27-11, with KGDB Amit Shah
2004-11-17 8:26 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-17 9:19 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-17 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-17 14:01 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 16:15 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-16 17:39 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-27 0:15 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.3 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:58 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-V0.7.1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-06 15:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.18 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 9:16 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.19 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 16:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.21 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-09 16:05 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 14:44 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-0 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 21:51 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 12:54 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-0 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 13:09 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 13:40 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm1-V0.7.27-3 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-16 14:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:08 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-16 15:52 ` Stefan Schweizer
2004-11-16 18:43 ` Marcos D. Marado Torres
2004-11-16 18:51 ` Lee Revell
2004-11-16 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-17 0:36 ` Bill Huey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041116230443.452497b9@mango.fruits.de \
--to=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=amit.shah@codito.com \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=emann@mrv.com \
--cc=gunther_persoons@spymac.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=shrybman@aei.ca \
--cc=sschweizer@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.