All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Sasa Stevanovic <mg94c18@alas.matf.bg.ac.yu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:50:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501262350.11896.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501270318290.4545@82.117.197.34>

On Wednesday 26 January 2005 22:16, Sasa Stevanovic wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I had some problems with my laptop's onetouch keys and it eventually led me to 
> keyboard.c file from 2.6.10 kernel (Vojtech Pavlik and others).  There may be 
> a bug in the file, please read below.
> 
> Well, actually, when all omnibook/messages/setkeycodes/hotkeys/xev/showkey etc 
> stuff is stripped off, what remains is that x86_keycodes array has only first 
> 240 members initialized, while remaining 16 are set to 0 due to [256]:
> 
> static unsigned short x86_keycodes[256] = { <only 240 here> };
> 
> (For my scenario, workaround was possible.)
> 
> I am not sure if this is a bug or not; it worked in 2.4.18 without workaround. 
> Might be that someone wanted to prevent reading invalid memory.  There are 
> many versions of the file/array definition found on the web, none of which has 
> a comment about this.
> 

>From Vojetch Pavilk:
> I'm sorry, but X only understands the RAW PS/2 protocol, and that one
>  can only transport keycodes up to 240.
>  
>  For keycodes above 240, XFree86 would either need to use the MediumRAW
>  mode, or use event devices for parsing the keyboard.
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0406.0/0544.html

You still did not describe what kind of problems you are having with your
keys.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-27  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-27  3:16 Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10) Sasa Stevanovic
2005-01-27  4:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2005-01-27 10:16   ` Sasa Stevanovic
2005-01-27 12:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-28  0:39   ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-28 10:59     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29  4:50       ` Al Viro
2005-01-29 11:25         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29 23:35           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-31  9:01             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-30  8:41           ` Al Viro
2005-01-30 23:21             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-30 23:29               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-03  6:54               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-29 12:11       ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-29 14:04         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-30 20:13           ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-28 11:10     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-28 21:59       ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-29 11:12         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29 23:30           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-30 23:16     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200501262350.11896.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mg94c18@alas.matf.bg.ac.yu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.