From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:29:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501301829.32452.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501301821.53924.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
On Sunday 30 January 2005 18:21, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sunday 30 January 2005 03:41, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:25:10PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > I know. As I said, this is a problem I know about, and will be fixed. I
> > > was mainly interested whether anyone sees further problems in scenarios
> > > which don't include device addition/removal.
> > >
> > > We already fixed this in serio, and input and gameport are next in the
> > > list.
> >
> > OK, I'll bite. What's to guarantee that no events will happen in
> > the middle of serio_unregister_port(), right after we'd done
> > serio_remove_pending_events()?
>
> At this point serio is disconnected from driver and serio_interrupt
> will only queue rescans only if serio->registered. I guess I will need
> to protect change to serio->registered and take serio->lock to be
> completely in clear.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
Oh, I just realized that this piece is not in main tree yet. You can
check the version that I am pushing to Vojtech here:
bk pull bk://dtor.bkbits.net/input
We still not agreed on need for start/stop methods though...
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-27 3:16 Possible bug in keyboard.c (2.6.10) Sasa Stevanovic
2005-01-27 4:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-27 10:16 ` Sasa Stevanovic
2005-01-27 12:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-28 0:39 ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-28 10:59 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29 4:50 ` Al Viro
2005-01-29 11:25 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29 23:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-31 9:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-30 8:41 ` Al Viro
2005-01-30 23:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-30 23:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2005-02-03 6:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-29 12:11 ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-29 14:04 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-30 20:13 ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-28 11:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-28 21:59 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-29 11:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-29 23:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-30 23:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501301829.32452.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.