From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthias Koerber <simakoer@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
scott.feldman@intel.com, ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:18:21 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050129181821.GA2128@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050128164811.GA8022@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 05:48:11PM +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have about 70 P4 uniprocessor machines (some with Hyperthreading
> capable CPUs) running linux 2.4.29, which are woken up on the weekdays
> by sending a WOL packet to them. The machines all have a E100 nic with
> WOL enabled in the bios. The E100 driver is compiled into the kernel
> and not loaded as a module.
>
> If the machine which should be woken up is already running (because
> someone switched it on by hand), the WOL packet causes keventd to go
> mad and "use" 100% CPU:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 2 root 15 0 0 0 0 R 99.9 0.0 140:50.94 keventd
Probably a task event is rescheduling itself repeatedly? e100 does not seem
to schedule_task() events directly, so I wonder what is going on.
Can you boot a machine with profile=2, then send the WOL packet causing
keventd to go mad and run:
readprofile | sort -nr +2 | head -20
After a few minutes.
Ganesh, Scott, Jeff, any ideas?
> This can be reproduced on any of the 70 machines by simply sending a WOL
> packet to it, when it's already running... No entry is made in the
> kernel log.
>
> The dmesg of an affected machine can be found at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-dmesg
> Our kernel-config is at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-generic-config
> lspci -vvv is at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-lspci
>
> We are using a kernel.org linux 2.4.29 kernel patched with the current
> autofs patch and ACL support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-28 16:48 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 18:53 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-28 18:54 ` Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 20:05 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-30 0:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-29 18:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2005-01-30 12:15 ` Michael Gernoth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-30 17:18 David Härdeman
2005-01-31 3:47 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 3:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 6:14 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 9:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 4:23 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 15:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-31 20:29 ` David Härdeman
2005-01-31 21:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 19:26 Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-01-31 20:57 ` Bukie Mabayoje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050129181821.GA2128@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
--cc=simakoer@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.