From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Bukie Mabayoje <bukiemab@gte.net>
Cc: sfeldma@pobox.com, "David Härdeman" <david@2gen.com>,
"Michael Gernoth" <simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FDB2D3.5CBD6F7D@gte.net>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:23:47PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
>
> Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 09:18, David Härdeman wrote:
> > > I experience the same problems as reported by Michael Gernoth when
> > > sending a WOL-packet to computer with a e100 NIC which is already
> > > powered on.
> >
> > I didn't look at the 2.4 case, but for 2.6, it seems e100 was enabling
> > PME wakeup during probe. PME shouldn't be enabled while the system is
> > up. I suspect the assertion of PME while the system is up is what's
> > causing problems. This patch moves PME wakeup enabling to either
> > suspend or shutdown.
> >
> > David, would you give this patch a try? Make sure the system still
> > wakes from a magic packet if suspended or shut down, and doesn't cause
> > kacpid to go crazy if system is running. If it helps for 2.6, perhaps
> > someone can look into 2.4 to see if there is something similar going on
>
> This issue was reported on 2.4.
Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-30 17:18 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad David Härdeman
2005-01-31 3:47 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 3:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 6:14 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 9:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 4:23 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 15:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2005-01-31 20:29 ` David Härdeman
2005-01-31 21:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-31 19:26 Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-01-31 20:57 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-28 16:48 Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 18:53 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-28 18:54 ` Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 20:05 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-30 0:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-29 18:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-30 12:15 ` Michael Gernoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=bukiemab@gte.net \
--cc=david@2gen.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sfeldma@pobox.com \
--cc=simigern@stud.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.