All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (3/8)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:26:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050207142603.A469@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050207193129.GB834@halcrow.us>; from mhalcrow@us.ibm.com on Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:31:30PM -0600

* Michael Halcrow (mhalcrow@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> This is the third in a series of eight patches to the BSD Secure
> Levels LSM.  It moves the claim on the block device from the inode
> struct to the file struct in order to address a potential
> circumvention of the control via hard links to block devices.  Thanks
> to Serge Hallyn for pointing this out.

Hard links still point to same inode, what's the issue that this
addresses?

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-07 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-07 19:21 [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: printk overhaul, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (1/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 19:30 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: suid/sgid on directories; open/mknod issue, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (2/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 19:31 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (3/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 22:26   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-02-07 22:41     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08  1:48       ` David Wagner
2005-02-08  2:10         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08  2:20           ` Chris Wright
2005-02-08  3:15             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 14:33           ` David Wagner
2005-02-07 22:42     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 17:24     ` Michael Halcrow
2005-02-08 17:47       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 20:08         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2005-02-08 23:38       ` Chris Wright
2005-02-07 19:32 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: memory alloc failure check, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (4/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 19:34 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: allow setuid/setgid on process if root, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (5/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 19:35 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: nits, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (6/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-08 23:43   ` Chris Wright
2005-02-07 19:36 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: comment cleanups, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (7/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-07 19:37 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: remove ptrace, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (8/8) Michael Halcrow
2005-02-10 21:59 ` [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels: printk overhaul, 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 (1/8) Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050207142603.A469@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.