From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@hotpop.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Frame Buffer Device Development
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
adaplas@pol.net,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make savagefb one module
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 04:49:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503060449.24256.adaplas@hotpop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050305011241.GO3327@stusta.de>
On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:12, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch links all selected files under drivers/video/savagefb/ into
> > > one module.
> > >
> > > This required a renaming of savagefb.c to savagefb_driver.c .
> > >
> > > As a side effect, the EXPORT_SYMBOL's in this directory are no longer
> > > required.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Other names than savagefb_driver.c (e.g. savagefb_main.c) are easily
> > > possible - I do not claim being good at picking names...
> >
> > savagefb_core.c?
>
> Antonino, what's your opinion?
I'll take your patch as is.
Tony
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@hotpop.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Frame Buffer Device Development
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
adaplas@pol.net,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [2.6 patch] make savagefb one module
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 04:49:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503060449.24256.adaplas@hotpop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050305011241.GO3327@stusta.de>
On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:12, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch links all selected files under drivers/video/savagefb/ into
> > > one module.
> > >
> > > This required a renaming of savagefb.c to savagefb_driver.c .
> > >
> > > As a side effect, the EXPORT_SYMBOL's in this directory are no longer
> > > required.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Other names than savagefb_driver.c (e.g. savagefb_main.c) are easily
> > > possible - I do not claim being good at picking names...
> >
> > savagefb_core.c?
>
> Antonino, what's your opinion?
I'll take your patch as is.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-01 2:41 RFC: disallow modular framebuffers Adrian Bunk
2005-03-01 3:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 6:07 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-01 6:07 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-01 17:52 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " James Simmons
2005-03-01 12:49 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-01 12:49 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-01 13:15 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-03 16:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-03 19:50 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-03 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-03 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-03 20:37 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-03 20:37 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-03 23:07 ` [2.6 patch] make savagefb one module Adrian Bunk
2005-03-04 9:17 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-03-05 1:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-05 1:12 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Adrian Bunk
2005-03-05 20:49 ` Antonino A. Daplas [this message]
2005-03-05 20:49 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-03-01 16:59 ` RFC: disallow modular framebuffers Jesse Barnes
2005-03-02 11:32 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " David Vrabel
2005-03-02 12:17 ` Paul Mundt
2005-03-02 18:01 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-02 18:01 ` Jon Smirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503060449.24256.adaplas@hotpop.com \
--to=adaplas@hotpop.com \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.