From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:20:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405202024.GQ16601@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405211619.A19117@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> glibc probably doesn't use the new sys_shmat() syscall yet - it's a
> relatively recent addition, so I think we have the opportunity to fix
> it if needs be.
>
> However, I don't know the glibc sources well enough to comment on the
> state of play there. And what's more, I don't know any active ARM
> glibc folk to ask about it. Sorry.
>
> (For the record, I've never been interested in glibc myself, and I've
> always hoped that there would be someone else to look after that side
> of things. However, it appears that this stance hasn't really resulted
> in a long lasting ARM glibc effort. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see
> _any_ signs out there which indicate otherwise.)
Since you already kept me on the cc list ;-) ARM libc seems to use the
good old wrapper syscall.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 4:01 [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 4:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-23 6:48 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:54 ` David Howells
2005-04-05 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 14:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 8:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 13:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 20:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-05 20:16 ` Russell King
2005-04-05 20:20 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2005-04-06 15:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-07 5:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-11 20:29 ` Russell King
2005-04-27 6:27 ` [PATCH] consolidate sys_shmat Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-27 12:50 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-27 14:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 8:05 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 8:06 ` [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Andi Kleen
2005-03-24 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:49 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405202024.GQ16601@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.