From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate sys_shmat
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:50:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050427125015.GU30431@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050427162709.6851e14b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:27:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I have minimised this patch a bit. It now just consolidates sys_shmat and
> in doing so, "fixes" the ABIs for MIPS(64) and ARM. ARM glibc does not
> use the sys_shmnat syscall directly so far (as far as I can see) and on
> MIPS64, the ABI that glibc seems to expect (I am pretty much guessing) is
> the fixed one.
Correct, so the patch is looking ok.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-27 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 4:01 [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 4:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-23 6:48 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:54 ` David Howells
2005-04-05 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 14:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 8:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 13:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 20:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-05 20:16 ` Russell King
2005-04-05 20:20 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-06 15:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-07 5:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-11 20:29 ` Russell King
2005-04-27 6:27 ` [PATCH] consolidate sys_shmat Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-27 12:50 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2005-04-27 14:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 8:05 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 8:06 ` [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Andi Kleen
2005-03-24 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:49 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050427125015.GU30431@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.