All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:58:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050616225838.GE3913@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1118960737.4301.483.camel@dyn9047017072.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:42, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> It's because you're sorting on the third field of readprofile(1),
>> which is pure gibberish. Undoing this mistake will immediately
>> enlighten you.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hmm.. I was under the impression that its gives useful info ..
> Here is readprofile man-page says:
>        Print the 20 most loaded procedures:
>           readprofile | sort -nr +2 | head -20

Unfortunately it's bunk. Sorting by hits gives a much better idea
of where the time is going because it corresponds to time. That's
done with readprofile | sort -nr +0 | head -20


On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:42, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Also, turn off slab poisoning when doing performance analyses.
> Its already off. I am not trying to compare performance here.
> I was trying to analyze VM behaviour with filesystem tests.
> (with "raw" devices, machine is perfectly happy - but with
> filesystem cache it crawls).

check_poison_obj(), which appears in your profile, exists only when
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is set.


-- wli

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:58:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050616225838.GE3913@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1118960737.4301.483.camel@dyn9047017072.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:42, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> It's because you're sorting on the third field of readprofile(1),
>> which is pure gibberish. Undoing this mistake will immediately
>> enlighten you.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hmm.. I was under the impression that its gives useful info ..
> Here is readprofile man-page says:
>        Print the 20 most loaded procedures:
>           readprofile | sort -nr +2 | head -20

Unfortunately it's bunk. Sorting by hits gives a much better idea
of where the time is going because it corresponds to time. That's
done with readprofile | sort -nr +0 | head -20


On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:42, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Also, turn off slab poisoning when doing performance analyses.
> Its already off. I am not trying to compare performance here.
> I was trying to analyze VM behaviour with filesystem tests.
> (with "raw" devices, machine is perfectly happy - but with
> filesystem cache it crawls).

check_poison_obj(), which appears in your profile, exists only when
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is set.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-16 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-15 17:36 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 18:30 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 18:30   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 18:30   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 18:30     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 19:02     ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 19:02       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 20:56       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 20:56         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  1:48         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-16  1:48           ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 23:23   ` Dave Chinner
2005-06-15 23:23     ` Dave Chinner
2005-06-15 21:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-15 21:39   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-15 22:35   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 22:35     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16  7:24   ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 19:50   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 20:37     ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 20:37       ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 23:43       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 23:43         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17  0:51         ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17  0:51           ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17 15:10           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17 15:10             ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17 21:13             ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17 21:13               ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-22  0:34               ` 2.6.12-mm1 & 2K lun testing (JFS problem ?) Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22  0:34                 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22  1:41                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-22  1:41                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-22 16:23                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 16:23                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 13:50                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-22 13:50                   ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-22 16:56                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 16:56                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 21:02                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 21:02                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:42     ` 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:42       ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:25       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:25         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:58         ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2005-06-16 22:58           ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050616225838.GE3913@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.