All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	shaggy@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-mm1 & 2K lun testing  (JFS problem ?)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:41:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050622014121.GB10690@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119400494.4620.33.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:34:54PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Shaggy,
> Here is the summary of 2K lun testing on 2.6.12-mm1.
> When I tune dirty ratios and CFQ queue depths, things
> seems to be running fine.
> 	echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> 	echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
> 	echo 4 > /sys/block/<device>/queue/nr_requests
> But, I am running into JFS problem. I can't kill my
> "dd" process. They all get stuck in:
> (I am going to try ext3).

If you could get unabridged profiling data for raw vs. fs (so it can
be properly sorted) I would be interested in that. Early indications
were large amounts of time spent in shrink_zone(), obtained by
re-sorting the truncated profile listings. It indicated the time spent
in shrink_zone() was 26.3 times as much time spent in default_idle().
Typically copying to and from userspace are enormous overheads, but
aren't observable in the truncated/mis-sorted profiles, which calls
them into question, barring unreported usage of O_DIRECT. There are
also no totals reported, which are helpful for interpreting realtime
behavior.


-- wli

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	shaggy@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-mm1 & 2K lun testing  (JFS problem ?)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:41:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050622014121.GB10690@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119400494.4620.33.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:34:54PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Shaggy,
> Here is the summary of 2K lun testing on 2.6.12-mm1.
> When I tune dirty ratios and CFQ queue depths, things
> seems to be running fine.
> 	echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> 	echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
> 	echo 4 > /sys/block/<device>/queue/nr_requests
> But, I am running into JFS problem. I can't kill my
> "dd" process. They all get stuck in:
> (I am going to try ext3).

If you could get unabridged profiling data for raw vs. fs (so it can
be properly sorted) I would be interested in that. Early indications
were large amounts of time spent in shrink_zone(), obtained by
re-sorting the truncated profile listings. It indicated the time spent
in shrink_zone() was 26.3 times as much time spent in default_idle().
Typically copying to and from userspace are enormous overheads, but
aren't observable in the truncated/mis-sorted profiles, which calls
them into question, barring unreported usage of O_DIRECT. There are
also no totals reported, which are helpful for interpreting realtime
behavior.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-22  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-15 17:36 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 18:30 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 18:30   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 18:30   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 18:30     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 19:02     ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 19:02       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 20:56       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 20:56         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  1:48         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-16  1:48           ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 23:23   ` Dave Chinner
2005-06-15 23:23     ` Dave Chinner
2005-06-15 21:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-15 21:39   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-15 22:35   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 22:35     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16  7:24   ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 19:50   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 20:37     ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 20:37       ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 23:43       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 23:43         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17  0:51         ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17  0:51           ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17 15:10           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17 15:10             ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17 21:13             ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-17 21:13               ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-22  0:34               ` 2.6.12-mm1 & 2K lun testing (JFS problem ?) Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22  0:34                 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22  1:41                 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2005-06-22  1:41                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-22 16:23                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 16:23                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 13:50                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-22 13:50                   ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-22 16:56                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 16:56                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 21:02                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 21:02                     ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:42     ` 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:42       ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:25       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:25         ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:58         ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:58           ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050622014121.GB10690@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=shaggy@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.