From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Rusty Lynch <rusty@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:08:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508300308.44706.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830001905.GA18279@linux.jf.intel.com>
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 02:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:
>
> So, assuming inlining the notifier_call_chain would address Christoph's
> conserns, is the following patch something like what you are sugesting?
Yes.
Well in theory you could make fast and slow notify_die too, but that's
probably not worth it.
-Andi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Rusty Lynch <rusty@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:08:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508300308.44706.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830001905.GA18279@linux.jf.intel.com>
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 02:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:
>
> So, assuming inlining the notifier_call_chain would address Christoph's
> conserns, is the following patch something like what you are sugesting?
Yes.
Well in theory you could make fast and slow notify_die too, but that's
probably not worth it.
-Andi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Rusty Lynch <rusty@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:08:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508300308.44706.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830001905.GA18279@linux.jf.intel.com>
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 02:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:
>
> So, assuming inlining the notifier_call_chain would address Christoph's
> conserns, is the following patch something like what you are sugesting?
Yes.
Well in theory you could make fast and slow notify_die too, but that's
probably not worth it.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-26 22:46 Re:[PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured Rusty Lynch
2005-08-26 23:05 ` Re:[PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES Christoph Lameter
2005-08-26 23:05 ` Re:[PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured Christoph Lameter
2005-08-26 23:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-27 0:24 ` [PATCH] " Andi Kleen
2005-08-27 0:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-27 0:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 0:19 ` Rusty Lynch
2005-08-30 0:19 ` Rusty Lynch
2005-08-30 0:19 ` Rusty Lynch
2005-08-30 1:08 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-08-30 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 3:28 ` [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 3:28 ` [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 3:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-19 18:22 ` [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 18:22 ` [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-25 20:14 Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 23:05 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 23:05 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 23:05 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 23:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-31 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-31 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-31 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:56 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508300308.44706.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty.lynch@intel.com \
--cc=rusty@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.