From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
discuss@x86-64.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com
Subject: [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:40:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050830184006.GG18998@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830183337.GF18998@tuxdriver.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:33:39PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >
> > > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
> > > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
> > >
> > > Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> > > different name.
> >
> > Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
> > and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical.
>
> How about a patch like this? Just for comment...I'll repost if people
> want it...
Probably should include the swiotlb_sync_sg_* variations too...
Whaddya think? Again, I'll repost if this is viewed favorably.
John
--- linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c.orig 2005-08-30 14:35:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-08-30 14:37:05.000000000 -0400
@@ -612,9 +612,9 @@ swiotlb_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, s
* The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, same rules
* and usage.
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
- int nelems, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
{
int i;
@@ -628,18 +628,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *h
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
int nelems, int dir)
{
- int i;
-
- if (dir = DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
-
- for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++)
- if (sg->dma_address != SG_ENT_PHYS_ADDRESS(sg))
- sync_single(hwdev, (void *) sg->dma_address,
- sg->dma_length, dir);
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
}
int
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
discuss@x86-64.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com
Subject: [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:40:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050830184006.GG18998@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830183337.GF18998@tuxdriver.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:33:39PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >
> > > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
> > > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
> > >
> > > Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> > > different name.
> >
> > Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
> > and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical.
>
> How about a patch like this? Just for comment...I'll repost if people
> want it...
Probably should include the swiotlb_sync_sg_* variations too...
Whaddya think? Again, I'll repost if this is viewed favorably.
John
--- linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c.orig 2005-08-30 14:35:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-08-30 14:37:05.000000000 -0400
@@ -612,9 +612,9 @@ swiotlb_unmap_sg(struct device *hwdev, s
* The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, same rules
* and usage.
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
- int nelems, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
{
int i;
@@ -628,18 +628,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *h
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ int nelems, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
int nelems, int dir)
{
- int i;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
-
- for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++, sg++)
- if (sg->dma_address != SG_ENT_PHYS_ADDRESS(sg))
- sync_single(hwdev, (void *) sg->dma_address,
- sg->dma_length, dir);
+ swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir);
}
int
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-29 20:09 [patch 2.6.13] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-08-29 20:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-29 21:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 1:14 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 17:54 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 17:58 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-08-30 17:58 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:00 ` [patch 2.6.13] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:03 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 18:03 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 18:09 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:09 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:33 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_single_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:33 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:40 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2005-08-30 18:40 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 1/6] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib to lib John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 2/6] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 3/6] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 5/6] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 6/6] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 18:51 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 19:51 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:51 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:53 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:53 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 20:23 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 20:23 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 23:45 ` [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] " John W. Linville
2005-09-12 23:45 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 23:59 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 23:59 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-13 4:05 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-09-13 4:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 20:37 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-09-22 20:37 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-22 20:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 20:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-23 18:22 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-23 18:22 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-09-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-09-23 18:27 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-23 18:27 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-23 18:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-23 18:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-23 21:38 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-23 21:38 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-26 7:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-26 7:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 0/5] " John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 1/5] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib to drivers/pci John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 2/5] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 3/5] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 4/5] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 5/5] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:01 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:33 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 0/5] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-26 21:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-26 21:54 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 21:54 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-26 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-26 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2005-09-26 22:46 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-26 22:46 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-27 0:14 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-27 0:14 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-27 2:47 ` Tony Luck
2005-09-27 2:47 ` Tony Luck
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 0/6] " John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 1/6] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib/ to lib/ John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 2/6] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 3/6] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 5/6] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-28 21:50 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 6/6] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-29 22:42 ` [patch 2.6.14-rc2 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-09-29 22:42 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050830184006.GG18998@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.