All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 06:02:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050923040234.GC595@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4332AC2E.8000607@cosmosbay.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:05:50PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
(...) 
> It was necessary to get the best code with gcc-3.4.4 on i386 and 
> gcc-4.0.1 on x86_64
> 
> For example :
> 
> bool1 = FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT);
> if (bool1) {
> 
> gives a better code than :
> 
> if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) {
> 
> (one less conditional branch)
> 
> Dont ask me why, it is shocking but true :(

I also noticed many times that gcc's optimization of "if (complex condition)"
is rather poor and it's often better to put it in a variable before. I even
remember that if you use an intermediate variable, it can often generate a
CMOV instruction on processors which support it, while it produces cond tests
and jumps without the variable. Generally speaking, if you want fast code,
you have to write it as a long sequence of small instructions, just as if
you were writing assembly. As you said, shocking but true.

BTW, cheers for your optimizations !

Regards,
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-23  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-19 17:09 [PATCH, netfilter] NUMA aware ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c Eric dumazet
2005-09-19 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-19 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-19 19:09   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20  9:47   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 16:30     ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-20 17:02       ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45       ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h , " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45         ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:46         ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:24           ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 22:43             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22  0:34               ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22  0:34                 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22  1:44                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 12:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:11                     ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:49                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 12:54                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 12:58                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 13:05                           ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 15:37                             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 15:50                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:50                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:55                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 17:11                                 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-23 17:44                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 18:04                                     ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-26 17:58                                       ` vmalloc_node Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 18:10                                         ` vmalloc_node Dave Hansen
2005-09-23 17:47                                   ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 18:00                                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-22  4:18             ` James Morris
2005-09-22  4:18               ` James Morris
2005-09-22  5:07               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:03             ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 13:30               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 17:09               ` Harald Welte
2005-09-27 16:23                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28  0:25                   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28  8:32                     ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28  8:32                       ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28  8:37                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28  8:37                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 17:01                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-05 16:53                           ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07  2:38                             ` Harald Welte
2005-10-06 17:59                               ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:08                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-07 17:21                                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:50                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-28 10:34                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28 10:34                         ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-11-25 11:23             ` [PATCH] netfilter : zap get_cpu()/put_cpu() calls from ip_tables Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 11:28               ` [PATCH (resent with the attachment !)] " Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 18:20                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-21 21:29           ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:57             ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:57               ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:17               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:32           ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:48             ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:48               ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:05               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23  4:02                 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2005-09-23  5:14                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 11:33                     ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 14:00                   ` Tim Mattox
2005-09-21 21:37           ` [PATCH 3/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:50             ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:50               ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050923040234.GC595@alpha.home.local \
    --to=willy@w.ods.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.