From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:07:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43323C2C.8070204@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509220017430.6397@excalibur.intercode>
James Morris a écrit :
>
> Do you have any performance measurements?
Yes, as I said in the first mail :
>In oprofile results, ipt_do_table() was at the first position.
>It is now at 6th position, using 1/3 of the CPU it was using before.
>(Tests done on a dual Xeon i386 and a dual Opteron x86_64)
On the dual opteron machine, with 40.000 packets coming per second, and 35.000
sent per second, the numbers were : 12.8 % before the patches, 4.4 % after the
patches.
I dont have separate perf measurements for each patch.
Considering the fact that I inlined the read_lock_bh() call (not displayed in
oprofile results, probably because of the special .spinlock.text section) that
should have increased the profile of ipt_do_table(), thats a lot of CPU cycles
and mem bandwitdh that are available for other jobs.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-19 17:09 [PATCH, netfilter] NUMA aware ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c Eric dumazet
2005-09-19 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-19 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-19 19:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 9:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 16:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-20 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45 ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h , " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:46 ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22 1:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 13:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 15:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 17:11 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-23 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 18:04 ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-26 17:58 ` vmalloc_node Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 18:10 ` vmalloc_node Dave Hansen
2005-09-23 17:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 18:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-22 4:18 ` James Morris
2005-09-22 4:18 ` James Morris
2005-09-22 5:07 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2005-09-22 13:03 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 13:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 17:09 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-27 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28 0:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28 8:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28 8:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 17:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-05 16:53 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 2:38 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-06 17:59 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-07 17:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-28 10:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28 10:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-11-25 11:23 ` [PATCH] netfilter : zap get_cpu()/put_cpu() calls from ip_tables Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 11:28 ` [PATCH (resent with the attachment !)] " Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 18:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-21 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:48 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:48 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 4:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 5:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 11:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 14:00 ` Tim Mattox
2005-09-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:50 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:50 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43323C2C.8070204@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.