From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:23:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509271823.19365.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050923170911.GN731@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>
On Friday 23 September 2005 19:09, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 1) No more central rwlock protecting each table (filter, nat, mangle,
> > > raw), but one lock per CPU. It avoids cache line ping pongs for each
> > > packet.
> >
> > Another useful change would be to not take the lock when there are no
> > rules. Currently just loading iptables has a large overhead.
>
> This is partially due to the netfilter hooks that are registered (so we
> always take nf_hook_slow() in the NF_HOOK() macro).
Not sure it's that. nf_hook_slow uses RCU, so it should be quite
fast.
> The default policies inside an iptables chain are internally implemented
> as a rule. Thus, policies as built-in rules have packet/byte counters.
That could be special cased and done lockless, with the counting
done per CPU.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-19 17:09 [PATCH, netfilter] NUMA aware ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c Eric dumazet
2005-09-19 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-19 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-19 19:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 9:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 16:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-20 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45 ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h , " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:46 ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22 1:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 13:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 15:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 17:11 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-23 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 18:04 ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-26 17:58 ` vmalloc_node Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 18:10 ` vmalloc_node Dave Hansen
2005-09-23 17:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 18:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-22 4:18 ` James Morris
2005-09-22 4:18 ` James Morris
2005-09-22 5:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:03 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 13:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 17:09 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-27 16:23 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-09-28 0:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28 8:32 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28 8:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28 8:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 17:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-05 16:53 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 2:38 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-06 17:59 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-07 17:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-28 10:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28 10:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-11-25 11:23 ` [PATCH] netfilter : zap get_cpu()/put_cpu() calls from ip_tables Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 11:28 ` [PATCH (resent with the attachment !)] " Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 18:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-21 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:57 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:48 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:48 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 4:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 5:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 11:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 14:00 ` Tim Mattox
2005-09-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:50 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 12:50 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509271823.19365.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.