From: John Gilmore <jgilmore@glycou.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Slowdown is gone & apt-get works with updated reiser4. So nevermind...
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:59:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511111359.39715.jgilmore@glycou.com> (raw)
I grabbed the reiser4 patch for 2.6.14-rc5 and compiled it. Thanks to
Vladimir V. Saveliev's comments about
EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page_dirty_for_io);
in mm/page-writeback.c, I was able to get it working as a module, and it seems
to have taken care of it.
I would have waited for the official 2.6.14-mm1 reiser patch before upgrading
to 2.6.14, but CD burning didn't work with 2.6.12.
<rant>
There is, btw, one main reason that I've decided that whatever trouble it may
cause, and whatever growing pangs I may experience along the way, root
reiser4 is worth it. Does anybody remember GoBack? It was a versioning system
for windows 95/98 that was incredibly flexible and useful. Tracked all
changes to the whole disk. Old versions of a file? no problem. grab an old
version of a directory for referance temporarily? easy. Got a virus? revert
the whole HD, and then grab the newer copies of your documents and saved
games as needed.
Microsoft includes an almost useless version of the same ability with their
"system restore" facility on XP, but I've never seen or heard of anybody
using it. And rightfully so, it majorly stinks. It doesn't track all files,
it's interface is opaque, the fact that it even exists is hidden seven layers
deep, you can't control which files are restored, you can't list previous
versions of a file, you can't copy an old version of a subdirectory and it's
contents out without wiping the new version. You can bet that in 10 years or
so, Microsoft will come out with a version of system restore that doesn't
suck though. Integrated into the file manager, right click access, and
everything else too.
Goback is the only thing that I missed when I switched over to linux, and
reiser4 is the only thing I've found that even hints at a similar ability.
Even if it takes another 10 years to reach the same point of usability that
GoBack had, it'll be well worth it.
And when that day comes, I won't even have to reformat (you didn't have to
reformat to install GoBack, either.) It's been 10 years or so since my last
format (Hrmm... a little over eight, actually) and I figured that as long as
my HD was trashed (another reason to love reiser4 - any fs that has a
standard tool that commonly trashes file systems beyond any hope of
recovery... darn fsck.ext3) I might as well prepare for the future, and get
better performance while I'm at it.
Note though, that features are definitely the first thing for me, performance
is nice but not something that I'll notice too much, and I'd definitely be
willing to sacrifice some to get enhanced semantics or versioning. Compiles
take forever no matter what you do, and as long as the little things (like
starting vim) don't take longer than a second or two, that's good enough.
</rant>
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-11 13:59 John Gilmore [this message]
2005-11-11 21:22 ` Slowdown is gone & apt-get works with updated reiser4. So nevermind Hans Reiser
2005-11-11 22:06 ` Jonathan Briggs
2005-11-12 3:07 ` michael chang
2005-11-12 6:38 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-12 9:06 ` John Gilmore
2005-11-12 20:57 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-12 21:28 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-13 0:55 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-13 12:18 ` Laurent Riffard
2005-11-13 12:25 ` Laurent Riffard
2005-11-13 12:29 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-13 13:12 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-11-13 14:05 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-14 17:48 ` Pat Double
2005-11-14 20:22 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-13 14:05 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-11-14 19:41 ` More Slowdown Craig Shelley
2005-11-14 19:53 ` jp
2005-11-14 20:47 ` Christian Iversen
2005-11-15 14:27 ` Craig Shelley
2005-11-15 18:04 ` Laurent Riffard
2005-11-15 18:42 ` Craig Shelley
[not found] ` <437AF653.9040001@namesys.com>
2005-11-16 9:33 ` Craig Shelley
2005-11-17 3:08 ` michael chang
2005-11-17 4:49 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-17 12:02 ` Artur Makówka
2005-11-17 12:40 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-11-17 10:34 ` John Gilmore
2005-11-17 21:12 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-18 20:45 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-17 8:56 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-11-17 9:36 ` PFC
2005-11-17 21:08 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-19 4:44 ` michael chang
2005-11-12 0:56 ` Versioning Plugin Peter van Hardenberg
2005-11-12 2:24 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-12 14:06 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-12 21:46 ` David Masover
2005-11-12 22:05 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 2:56 ` David Masover
2005-11-13 3:05 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 4:23 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-13 3:28 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-12 22:54 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-13 0:57 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 1:55 ` michael chang
2005-11-13 1:56 ` michael chang
2005-11-13 2:13 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 3:03 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-13 2:13 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 2:27 ` Hans Reiser
2005-11-13 2:32 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-13 2:53 ` michael chang
2005-11-13 2:56 ` Ming Zhang
2005-11-12 22:57 ` Lares Moreau
2005-11-12 23:35 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511111359.39715.jgilmore@glycou.com \
--to=jgilmore@glycou.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.